nanotechnology: was created

Related concepts

Parents	technology Weight: 0.66 , sector Weight: 0.65 , field Weight: 0.63 , topic Weight: 0.62 , issue Weight: 0.59
Siblings	computer science Weight: 0.36 , fiber optics Weight: 0.35 , optics Weight: 0.34 , semiconductor Weight: 0.34 , automobile industry Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property	Similarity
was created	1.00
was invented	0.79
is is developed	0.79
was discovered	0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.49

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.60

Plausible(field, was discovered) ⋁

Evidence: 0.07

¬ Typical(nanotechnology, was created)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.04

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.26

Plausible(nanotechnology, was created) ⋁

Evidence: 0.60

¬ Plausible(field, was discovered)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.13

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.94

¬ Remarkable(nanotechnology, was created) ⋁

Evidence: 0.76

¬ Remarkable(field, was discovered)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.04

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.94

¬ Remarkable(nanotechnology, was created) ⋁

Evidence: 0.70

¬ Remarkable(fiber optics, was invented)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.60

Plausible(field, was discovered) ⋁

Evidence: 0.94

Remarkable(nanotechnology, was created) ⋁

Evidence: 0.26

¬ Plausible(nanotechnology, was created)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.38

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.26

Plausible(nanotechnology, was created) ⋁

Evidence: 0.70

Remarkable(fiber optics, was invented) ⋁

Evidence: 0.89

¬ Plausible(fiber optics, was invented)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.26

Plausible(nanotechnology, was created) ⋁

Evidence: 0.51

¬ Salient(nanotechnology, was created)

Similarity expansion

0.64

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.07

Typical(nanotechnology, was created) ⋁

Evidence: 0.05

¬ Typical(nanotechnology, is is developed)

0.64

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.94

Remarkable(nanotechnology, was created) ⋁

Evidence: 0.85

¬ Remarkable(nanotechnology, is is developed)

0.63

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.94

Remarkable(nanotechnology, was created) ⋁

Evidence: 0.90

¬ Remarkable(nanotechnology, was invented)

0.62

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.94

Remarkable(nanotechnology, was created) ⋁

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Remarkable(nanotechnology, was discovered)

0.58

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.26

Plausible(nanotechnology, was created) ⋁

Evidence: 0.17

¬ Plausible(nanotechnology, is is developed)

0.56

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.51

Salient(nanotechnology, was created) ⋁

Evidence: 0.34

¬ Salient(nanotechnology, is is developed)

0.50

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.51

Salient(nanotechnology, was created) ⋁

Evidence: 0.45

¬ Salient(nanotechnology, was discovered)

0.47

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.07

Typical(nanotechnology, was created) ⋁

Evidence: 0.29

¬ Typical(nanotechnology, was discovered)

0.47

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.07

Typical(nanotechnology, was created) ⋁

Evidence: 0.32

¬ Typical(nanotechnology, was invented)

0.47

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.26

Plausible(nanotechnology, was created) ⋁

Evidence: 0.37

¬ Plausible(nanotechnology, was discovered)

0.43

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.51

Salient(nanotechnology, was created) ⋁

Evidence: 0.72

¬ Salient(nanotechnology, was invented)

0.43

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.26

Plausible(nanotechnology, was created) ⋁

Evidence: 0.50

¬ Plausible(nanotechnology, was invented)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.51

Salient(nanotechnology, was created) ⋁

Evidence: 0.07

¬ Typical(nanotechnology, was created) ⋁

Evidence: 0.94

¬ Remarkable(nanotechnology, was created)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.26

Plausible(nanotechnology, was created) ⋁

Evidence: 0.07

¬ Typical(nanotechnology, was created)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.18

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.94

¬ Remarkable(nanotechnology, was created) ⋁

Evidence: 0.57

¬ Typical(field, was discovered)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.02

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.14
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.94

¬ Remarkable(nanotechnology, was created) ⋁

Evidence: 0.91

¬ Typical(fiber optics, was invented)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.17

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.07

Typical(nanotechnology, was created) ⋁

Evidence: 0.57

¬ Typical(field, was discovered)