:
from
Related concepts
Related properties
Priors about this statement
Cues
|
Evidence
|
Clauses
Plausibility inference from child typicality
Plausibility inheritance from parent to child
Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child
Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings
Remarkability from parent implausibility
Remarkability from sibling implausibility
Salient implies Plausible
0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(nasa, was formed)
⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Salient(nasa, was formed)
Similarity expansion
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(nasa, was formed)
⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(nasa, was form)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.23
Salient(nasa, was formed)
⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Salient(nasa, was form)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.13
Typical(nasa, was formed)
⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(nasa, was form)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(nasa, was formed)
⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(nasa, was form)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(nasa, was formed)
⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(nasa, was created)
Typical and Remarkable implies Salient
Typical implies Plausible
0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(nasa, was formed)
⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(nasa, was formed)
Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child
Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings
Typicality inheritance from parent to child