nasa: was developed

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents science
Weight: 0.58
, place
Weight: 0.57
, institution
Weight: 0.56
, resource
Weight: 0.56
Siblings venice
Weight: 0.32
, mexico city
Weight: 0.32
, santa fe
Weight: 0.32
, columbia
Weight: 0.32
, philippines
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
was developed 1.00
was created 0.83
was established 0.81
was invented 0.81
was formed 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(science, was invented) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(nasa, was developed)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(science, was created) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(nasa, was developed)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(resource, was created) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(nasa, was developed)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(nasa, was developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(resource, was created)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(nasa, was developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(science, was created)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(nasa, was developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(science, was invented)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.25
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(nasa, was developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(resource, was created)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(nasa, was developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(science, was invented)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(nasa, was developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(science, was created)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(nasa, was developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(philippines, was formed)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(science, was created) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(nasa, was developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(nasa, was developed)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(science, was invented) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(nasa, was developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(nasa, was developed)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(resource, was created) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(nasa, was developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(nasa, was developed)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(nasa, was developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(philippines, was formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(philippines, was formed)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(nasa, was developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Salient(nasa, was developed)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(nasa, was developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(nasa, was established)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.31
Salient(nasa, was developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Salient(nasa, was established)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(nasa, was developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(nasa, was established)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(nasa, was developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(nasa, was created)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(nasa, was developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(nasa, was formed)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(nasa, was developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(nasa, was formed)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(nasa, was developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(nasa, was established)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.31
Salient(nasa, was developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Salient(nasa, was formed)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(nasa, was developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(nasa, was created)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(nasa, was developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(nasa, was formed)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(nasa, was developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(nasa, was invented)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.31
Salient(nasa, was developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Salient(nasa, was created)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(nasa, was developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(nasa, was invented)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(nasa, was developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(nasa, was invented)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(nasa, was developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(nasa, was created)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.31
Salient(nasa, was developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(nasa, was invented)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
Salient(nasa, was developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(nasa, was developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(nasa, was developed)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(nasa, was developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(nasa, was developed)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(nasa, was developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(resource, was created)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(nasa, was developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(science, was created)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(nasa, was developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(science, was invented)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(nasa, was developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(philippines, was formed)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(nasa, was developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(resource, was created)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(nasa, was developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(science, was created)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(nasa, was developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(science, was invented)