nasa: was invented

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents science
Weight: 0.58
, place
Weight: 0.57
, institution
Weight: 0.56
, resource
Weight: 0.56
Siblings venice
Weight: 0.32
, mexico city
Weight: 0.32
, santa fe
Weight: 0.32
, columbia
Weight: 0.32
, philippines
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
was invented 1.00
was developed 0.81
was created 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.57
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(science, was invented) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(nasa, was invented)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(science, was created) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(nasa, was invented)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(resource, was created) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(nasa, was invented)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(nasa, was invented) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(science, was invented)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(nasa, was invented) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(resource, was created)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(nasa, was invented) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(science, was created)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.11
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.20
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(nasa, was invented) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(science, was invented)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(nasa, was invented) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(resource, was created)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.17
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(nasa, was invented) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(science, was created)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(science, was invented) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(nasa, was invented) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(nasa, was invented)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(science, was created) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(nasa, was invented) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(nasa, was invented)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(resource, was created) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(nasa, was invented) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(nasa, was invented)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(nasa, was invented) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(nasa, was invented)

Similarity expansion

0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(nasa, was invented) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Salient(nasa, was developed)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(nasa, was invented) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(nasa, was developed)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.48
Typical(nasa, was invented) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(nasa, was created)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(nasa, was invented) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(nasa, was developed)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(nasa, was invented) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(nasa, was created)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(nasa, was invented) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Salient(nasa, was created)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.48
Typical(nasa, was invented) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(nasa, was developed)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(nasa, was invented) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(nasa, was created)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(nasa, was invented) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(nasa, was invented) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(nasa, was invented)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(nasa, was invented) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(nasa, was invented)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(nasa, was invented) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(resource, was created)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(nasa, was invented) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(science, was created)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(nasa, was invented) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(science, was invented)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.48
Typical(nasa, was invented) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(resource, was created)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Typical(nasa, was invented) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(science, was invented)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.48
Typical(nasa, was invented) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(science, was created)