national park: be at place besides state

Related concepts

Parents	land Weight: 0.69 , park Weight: 0.69 , city Weight: 0.69 , area Weight: 0.61
Siblings	death valley Weight: 0.69 , beach Weight: 0.63 , glacier Weight: 0.61 , great barrier reef Weight: 0.60 , monument Weight: 0.59

Related properties

Property	Similarity
be at place besides state	1.00
be at state	0.81
be a part of state	0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.52

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.67

Plausible(city, be at state) ⋁

Evidence: 0.09

¬ Typical(national park, be at place besides state)

0.49

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.22

Plausible(city, be a part of state) ⋁

Evidence: 0.09

¬ Typical(national park, be at place besides state)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.73

Plausible(national park, be at place besides state) ⋁

Evidence: 0.22

¬ Plausible(city, be a part of state)

0.06

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.73

Plausible(national park, be at place besides state) ⋁

Evidence: 0.67

¬ Plausible(city, be at state)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.20

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Remarkable(national park, be at place besides state) ⋁

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Remarkable(city, be a part of state)

0.19

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Remarkable(national park, be at place besides state) ⋁

Evidence: 0.75

¬ Remarkable(city, be at state)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.67

Plausible(city, be at state) ⋁

Evidence: 0.78

Remarkable(national park, be at place besides state) ⋁

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Plausible(national park, be at place besides state)

0.29

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.22

Plausible(city, be a part of state) ⋁

Evidence: 0.78

Remarkable(national park, be at place besides state) ⋁

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Plausible(national park, be at place besides state)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.73

Plausible(national park, be at place besides state) ⋁

Evidence: 0.94

¬ Salient(national park, be at place besides state)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.94

Salient(national park, be at place besides state) ⋁

Evidence: 0.09

¬ Typical(national park, be at place besides state) ⋁

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Remarkable(national park, be at place besides state)

Typical implies Plausible

0.47

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.73

Plausible(national park, be at place besides state) ⋁

Evidence: 0.09

¬ Typical(national park, be at place besides state)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.37

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Remarkable(national park, be at place besides state) ⋁

Evidence: 0.15

¬ Typical(city, be at state)

0.28

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Remarkable(national park, be at place besides state) ⋁

Evidence: 0.39

¬ Typical(city, be a part of state)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.34

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.09

Typical(national park, be at place besides state) ⋁

Evidence: 0.15

¬ Typical(city, be at state)

0.25

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.09

Typical(national park, be at place besides state) ⋁

Evidence: 0.39

¬ Typical(city, be a part of state)