national park: was formed

Related concepts

Parents	national forest Weight: 0.77 , area Weight: 0.70 , land Weight: 0.69 , park Weight: 0.69
Siblings	grand canyon Weight: 0.74 , death valley Weight: 0.69 , beach Weight: 0.63 , joshua tree Weight: 0.63

Related properties

Property	Similarity
was formed	1.00
was established	0.83

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.55

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.70

Plausible(park, was formed) ⋁

Evidence: 0.57

¬ Typical(national park, was formed)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.60

Plausible(national park, was formed) ⋁

Evidence: 0.70

¬ Plausible(park, was formed)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.24

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.74

¬ Remarkable(national park, was formed) ⋁

Evidence: 0.79

¬ Remarkable(park, was formed)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.74

¬ Remarkable(national park, was formed) ⋁

Evidence: 0.70

¬ Remarkable(death valley, was formed)

0.06

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.74

¬ Remarkable(national park, was formed) ⋁

Evidence: 0.77

¬ Remarkable(grand canyon, was formed)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.40

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.70

Plausible(park, was formed) ⋁

Evidence: 0.74

Remarkable(national park, was formed) ⋁

Evidence: 0.60

¬ Plausible(national park, was formed)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.60

Plausible(national park, was formed) ⋁

Evidence: 0.70

Remarkable(death valley, was formed) ⋁

Evidence: 0.32

¬ Plausible(death valley, was formed)

0.56

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.60

Plausible(national park, was formed) ⋁

Evidence: 0.77

Remarkable(grand canyon, was formed) ⋁

Evidence: 0.66

¬ Plausible(grand canyon, was formed)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.60

Plausible(national park, was formed) ⋁

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Salient(national park, was formed)

Similarity expansion

0.64

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.74

Remarkable(national park, was formed) ⋁

Evidence: 0.40

¬ Remarkable(national park, was established)

0.57

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.73

Salient(national park, was formed) ⋁

Evidence: 0.72

¬ Salient(national park, was established)

0.50

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.60

Plausible(national park, was formed) ⋁

Evidence: 0.75

¬ Plausible(national park, was established)

0.44

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.57

Typical(national park, was formed) ⋁

Evidence: 0.87

¬ Typical(national park, was established)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.73

Salient(national park, was formed) ⋁

Evidence: 0.57

¬ Typical(national park, was formed) ⋁

Evidence: 0.74

¬ Remarkable(national park, was formed)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.60

Plausible(national park, was formed) ⋁

Evidence: 0.57

¬ Typical(national park, was formed)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.26

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.74

¬ Remarkable(national park, was formed) ⋁

Evidence: 0.67

¬ Typical(park, was formed)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.74

¬ Remarkable(national park, was formed) ⋁

Evidence: 0.26

¬ Typical(death valley, was formed)

0.07

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.74

¬ Remarkable(national park, was formed) ⋁

Evidence: 0.63

¬ Typical(grand canyon, was formed)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.34

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.57

Typical(national park, was formed) ⋁

Evidence: 0.67

¬ Typical(park, was formed)