national parks: give people

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents park
Weight: 0.70
, campground
Weight: 0.64
, wilderness
Weight: 0.64
, united states
Weight: 0.63
Siblings yellowstone national park
Weight: 0.83
, lake powell
Weight: 0.70
, yellowstone
Weight: 0.57
, national park
Weight: 0.40
, central park
Weight: 0.39

Related properties

Property Similarity
give people 1.00
be important to people 0.82
get cancelled 0.78
give chance enjoy 0.78
be important to people of city 0.77
be important to people of new city 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.53
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(park, give people)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(national parks, give people)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(park, be important to people)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(national parks, give people)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(national parks, give people)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(park, give people)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(national parks, give people)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(park, be important to people)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(national parks, give people)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(park, give people)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(national parks, give people)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(park, be important to people)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(national parks, give people)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(central park, be important to people)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(national parks, give people)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(central park, be important to people of new city)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(national parks, give people)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(central park, be important to people of city)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(park, give people)
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(national parks, give people)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(national parks, give people)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(park, be important to people)
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(national parks, give people)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(national parks, give people)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(national parks, give people)
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(central park, be important to people)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(central park, be important to people)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(national parks, give people)
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(central park, be important to people of city)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(central park, be important to people of city)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(national parks, give people)
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(central park, be important to people of new city)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(central park, be important to people of new city)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(national parks, give people)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(national parks, give people)

Similarity expansion

0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(national parks, give people)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(national parks, give chance enjoy)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(national parks, give people)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(national parks, give chance enjoy)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(national parks, give people)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(national parks, give chance enjoy)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(national parks, give people)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(national parks, give chance enjoy)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(national parks, give people)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(national parks, give people)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(national parks, give people)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(national parks, give people)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(national parks, give people)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.19
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(national parks, give people)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(park, give people)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(national parks, give people)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(park, be important to people)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(national parks, give people)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(central park, be important to people of city)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(national parks, give people)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(central park, be important to people)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(national parks, give people)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(central park, be important to people of new city)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(national parks, give people)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(park, give people)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(national parks, give people)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(park, be important to people)