national parks: is australia

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents park
Weight: 0.70
, campground
Weight: 0.64
, wilderness
Weight: 0.64
, united states
Weight: 0.63
Siblings yellowstone national park
Weight: 0.83
, lake powell
Weight: 0.70
, yellowstone
Weight: 0.57
, national park
Weight: 0.40
, central park
Weight: 0.39

Related properties

Property Similarity
is australia 1.00
is important australia 0.98
is uk 0.83
is important uk 0.81
make fun of canada 0.79
be important to singapore 0.79
is america 0.77
is important america 0.75
be in africa 0.75
be in new mexico 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(park, be important to singapore) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(national parks, is australia)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(park, make fun of canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(national parks, is australia)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(park, be in new mexico) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(national parks, is australia)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(united states, be in africa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(national parks, is australia)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(wilderness, is uk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(national parks, is australia)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(national parks, is australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(wilderness, is uk)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(national parks, is australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(united states, be in africa)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(national parks, is australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(park, make fun of canada)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(national parks, is australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(park, be important to singapore)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(national parks, is australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(park, be in new mexico)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(national parks, is australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(united states, be in africa)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(national parks, is australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(park, make fun of canada)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(national parks, is australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(park, be in new mexico)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(national parks, is australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(park, be important to singapore)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(national parks, is australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(wilderness, is uk)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(park, be important to singapore) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(national parks, is australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(national parks, is australia)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(park, make fun of canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(national parks, is australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(national parks, is australia)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(wilderness, is uk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(national parks, is australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(national parks, is australia)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(park, be in new mexico) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(national parks, is australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(national parks, is australia)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(united states, be in africa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(national parks, is australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(national parks, is australia)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(national parks, is australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(national parks, is australia)

Similarity expansion

0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(national parks, is australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(national parks, is important australia)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(national parks, is australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(national parks, is america)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(national parks, is australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(national parks, is important australia)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(national parks, is australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(national parks, is america)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(national parks, is australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Salient(national parks, is america)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(national parks, is australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(national parks, is important america)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(national parks, is australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(national parks, is america)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(national parks, is australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(national parks, is important america)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(national parks, is australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(national parks, is important australia)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(national parks, is australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(national parks, is important australia)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(national parks, is australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(national parks, is important america)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(national parks, is australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(national parks, is important america)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(national parks, is australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(national parks, is australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(national parks, is australia)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(national parks, is australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(national parks, is australia)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(national parks, is australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(wilderness, is uk)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(national parks, is australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(united states, be in africa)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.23
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(national parks, is australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(park, make fun of canada)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.21
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(national parks, is australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(park, be important to singapore)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.18
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(national parks, is australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(park, be in new mexico)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(national parks, is australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(wilderness, is uk)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(national parks, is australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(united states, be in africa)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(national parks, is australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(park, make fun of canada)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(national parks, is australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(park, be important to singapore)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(national parks, is australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(park, be in new mexico)