national parks: is managed

Related concepts

Parents	park Weight: 0.70 , campground Weight: 0.64 , wilderness Weight: 0.64 , united states Weight: 0.63
Siblings	yellowstone national park Weight: 0.83 , lake powell Weight: 0.70 , yellowstone Weight: 0.57 , national park Weight: 0.40 , central park Weight: 0.39

Related properties

Property	Similarity
is managed	1.00
is poorly managed	0.85

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.19

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.49

Plausible(national parks, is managed) ⋁

Evidence: 0.67

¬ Salient(national parks, is managed)

Similarity expansion

0.72

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.83

Remarkable(national parks, is managed) ⋁

Evidence: 0.02

¬ Remarkable(national parks, is poorly managed)

0.71

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.67

Salient(national parks, is managed) ⋁

Evidence: 0.05

¬ Salient(national parks, is poorly managed)

0.61

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.39

Typical(national parks, is managed) ⋁

Evidence: 0.26

¬ Typical(national parks, is poorly managed)

0.60

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.49

Plausible(national parks, is managed) ⋁

Evidence: 0.34

¬ Plausible(national parks, is poorly managed)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.67

Salient(national parks, is managed) ⋁

Evidence: 0.39

¬ Typical(national parks, is managed) ⋁

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Remarkable(national parks, is managed)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.49

Plausible(national parks, is managed) ⋁

Evidence: 0.39

¬ Typical(national parks, is managed)