national parks: is poorly managed

Related concepts

Parents	park Weight: 0.70 , campground Weight: 0.64 , wilderness Weight: 0.64 , united states Weight: 0.63
Siblings	yellowstone national park Weight: 0.83 , lake powell Weight: 0.70 , yellowstone Weight: 0.57 , national park Weight: 0.40 , central park Weight: 0.39

Related properties

Property	Similarity
is poorly managed	1.00
is managed	0.85

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.27

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.34

Plausible(national parks, is poorly managed) ⋁

Evidence: 0.05

¬ Salient(national parks, is poorly managed)

Similarity expansion

0.52

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.26

Typical(national parks, is poorly managed) ⋁

Evidence: 0.39

¬ Typical(national parks, is managed)

0.49

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.34

Plausible(national parks, is poorly managed) ⋁

Evidence: 0.49

¬ Plausible(national parks, is managed)

0.27

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.05

Salient(national parks, is poorly managed) ⋁

Evidence: 0.67

¬ Salient(national parks, is managed)

0.14

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.19
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.02

Remarkable(national parks, is poorly managed) ⋁

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Remarkable(national parks, is managed)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.05

Salient(national parks, is poorly managed) ⋁

Evidence: 0.26

¬ Typical(national parks, is poorly managed) ⋁

Evidence: 0.02

¬ Remarkable(national parks, is poorly managed)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.34

Plausible(national parks, is poorly managed) ⋁

Evidence: 0.26

¬ Typical(national parks, is poorly managed)