national parks: is popular

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents park
Weight: 0.70
, campground
Weight: 0.64
, wilderness
Weight: 0.64
, united states
Weight: 0.63
Siblings yellowstone national park
Weight: 0.83
, lake powell
Weight: 0.70
, yellowstone
Weight: 0.57
, national park
Weight: 0.40
, central park
Weight: 0.39

Related properties

Property Similarity
is popular 1.00
is famous 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.63
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(park, is popular)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(national parks, is popular)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(park, is famous)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(national parks, is popular)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(national parks, is popular)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(park, is popular)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(national parks, is popular)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(park, is famous)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(national parks, is popular)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(park, is popular)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(national parks, is popular)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(park, is famous)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(national parks, is popular)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(yellowstone, is popular)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(national parks, is popular)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(central park, is popular)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(national parks, is popular)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(yellowstone national park, is popular)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(national parks, is popular)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(national park, is popular)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(national parks, is popular)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(yellowstone, is famous)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(national parks, is popular)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(central park, is famous)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(national parks, is popular)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(national park, is famous)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(national parks, is popular)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(yellowstone national park, is famous)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(park, is popular)
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(national parks, is popular)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(national parks, is popular)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(park, is famous)
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(national parks, is popular)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(national parks, is popular)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(national parks, is popular)
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(national park, is popular)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(national park, is popular)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(national parks, is popular)
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(yellowstone national park, is popular)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(yellowstone national park, is popular)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(national parks, is popular)
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(central park, is popular)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(central park, is popular)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(national parks, is popular)
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(yellowstone, is popular)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(yellowstone, is popular)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(national parks, is popular)
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(yellowstone national park, is famous)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(yellowstone national park, is famous)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(national parks, is popular)
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(national park, is famous)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(national park, is famous)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(national parks, is popular)
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(central park, is famous)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(central park, is famous)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(national parks, is popular)
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(yellowstone, is famous)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(yellowstone, is famous)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(national parks, is popular)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(national parks, is popular)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(national parks, is popular)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(national parks, is popular)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(national parks, is popular)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(national parks, is popular)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(national parks, is popular)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.18
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(national parks, is popular)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(park, is popular)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(national parks, is popular)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(park, is famous)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(national parks, is popular)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(yellowstone, is popular)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(national parks, is popular)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(national park, is popular)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(national parks, is popular)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(yellowstone national park, is popular)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(national parks, is popular)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(central park, is popular)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(national parks, is popular)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(yellowstone, is famous)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(national parks, is popular)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(yellowstone national park, is famous)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(national parks, is popular)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(national park, is famous)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(national parks, is popular)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(central park, is famous)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.48
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(national parks, is popular)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(park, is popular)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(national parks, is popular)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(park, is famous)