national parks: were set up in 1950s

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents park
Weight: 0.70
, campground
Weight: 0.64
, wilderness
Weight: 0.64
, united states
Weight: 0.63
Siblings yellowstone national park
Weight: 0.83
, lake powell
Weight: 0.70
, yellowstone
Weight: 0.57
, national park
Weight: 0.40
, central park
Weight: 0.39

Related properties

Property Similarity
were set up in 1950s 1.00
were made 0.77
be in burnaby 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.62
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(park, were set up in 1950s) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(national parks, were set up in 1950s)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(park, were made) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(national parks, were set up in 1950s)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(national parks, were set up in 1950s) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(park, were set up in 1950s)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(national parks, were set up in 1950s) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(park, were made)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.47
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(national parks, were set up in 1950s) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(park, were set up in 1950s)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(national parks, were set up in 1950s) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(park, were made)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(national parks, were set up in 1950s) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(central park, be in burnaby)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(park, were set up in 1950s) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(national parks, were set up in 1950s) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(national parks, were set up in 1950s)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(park, were made) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(national parks, were set up in 1950s) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(national parks, were set up in 1950s)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(national parks, were set up in 1950s) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(central park, be in burnaby) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(central park, be in burnaby)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(national parks, were set up in 1950s) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(national parks, were set up in 1950s)

Similarity expansion

0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(national parks, were set up in 1950s) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(national parks, were made)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(national parks, were set up in 1950s) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Salient(national parks, were made)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(national parks, were set up in 1950s) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(national parks, were made)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(national parks, were set up in 1950s) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(national parks, were made)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(national parks, were set up in 1950s) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(national parks, were set up in 1950s) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(national parks, were set up in 1950s)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(national parks, were set up in 1950s) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(national parks, were set up in 1950s)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(national parks, were set up in 1950s) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(park, were set up in 1950s)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(national parks, were set up in 1950s) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(park, were made)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(national parks, were set up in 1950s) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(central park, be in burnaby)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(national parks, were set up in 1950s) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(park, were set up in 1950s)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(national parks, were set up in 1950s) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(park, were made)