native american: were treated after world war 2

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents south america
Weight: 0.76
, american
Weight: 0.70
, america
Weight: 0.69
, native
Weight: 0.52
Siblings george washington
Weight: 0.70
, apache
Weight: 0.62
, cherokee
Weight: 0.61
, spanish
Weight: 0.61
, eskimo
Weight: 0.57

Related properties

Property Similarity
were treated after world war 2 1.00
were treated after war 0.94
were treated in war 0.92
were treated in french war 0.85
were were treated 0.84
were treated 0.84
were people treated 0.83
were treated in america 0.82
were old people treated 0.81
were treated by british 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.63
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(american, were treated after war) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(native american, were treated after world war 2)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(american, were treated in america) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(native american, were treated after world war 2)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(native american, were treated after world war 2) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Plausible(american, were treated after war)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(native american, were treated after world war 2) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Plausible(american, were treated in america)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.24
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(native american, were treated after world war 2) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(american, were treated after war)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(native american, were treated after world war 2) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(american, were treated in america)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(american, were treated after war) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(native american, were treated after world war 2) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(native american, were treated after world war 2)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(american, were treated in america) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(native american, were treated after world war 2) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(native american, were treated after world war 2)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(native american, were treated after world war 2) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(native american, were treated after world war 2)

Similarity expansion

0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.99
Typical(native american, were treated after world war 2) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(native american, were treated after war)
0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(native american, were treated after world war 2) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(native american, were treated after war)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(native american, were treated after world war 2) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(native american, were treated after war)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.99
Typical(native american, were treated after world war 2) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(native american, were treated)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(native american, were treated after world war 2) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(native american, were treated)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(native american, were treated after world war 2) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(native american, were treated)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.99
Typical(native american, were treated after world war 2) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(native american, were treated in america)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.99
Typical(native american, were treated after world war 2) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(native american, were old people treated)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(native american, were treated after world war 2) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(native american, were treated in america)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(native american, were treated after world war 2) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(native american, were old people treated)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(native american, were treated after world war 2) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(native american, were treated in america)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(native american, were treated after world war 2) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(native american, were old people treated)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(native american, were treated after world war 2) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(native american, were treated after war)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(native american, were treated after world war 2) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(native american, were old people treated)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(native american, were treated after world war 2) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(native american, were treated)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(native american, were treated after world war 2) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(native american, were treated in america)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(native american, were treated after world war 2) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(native american, were treated after world war 2) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(native american, were treated after world war 2)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(native american, were treated after world war 2) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(native american, were treated after world war 2)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.21
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(native american, were treated after world war 2) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(american, were treated after war)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(native american, were treated after world war 2) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(american, were treated in america)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.99
Typical(native american, were treated after world war 2) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(american, were treated after war)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.99
Typical(native american, were treated after world war 2) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(american, were treated in america)