natural gas: be better choice than coal

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents resource
Weight: 0.72
, mineral
Weight: 0.71
, power plant
Weight: 0.70
, natural
Weight: 0.68
Siblings fuel oil
Weight: 0.81
, oil
Weight: 0.67
, methane
Weight: 0.66
, gasoline
Weight: 0.65
, ethanol
Weight: 0.64

Related properties

Property Similarity
be better choice than coal 1.00
be better than coal 0.95
be cheaper than coal 0.92
be more efficient than coal 0.91
be cleaner than coal 0.90
be less than oil less than coal 0.89
burn cleaner than coal 0.88
be better than coal boilers 0.85
be better than oil 0.81
be better than petroleum 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(natural gas, be better choice than coal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(fuel oil, be better than coal)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(natural gas, be better choice than coal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(fuel oil, be better than coal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(fuel oil, be better than coal)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(natural gas, be better choice than coal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Salient(natural gas, be better choice than coal)

Similarity expansion

0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(natural gas, be better choice than coal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(natural gas, be better than coal)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(natural gas, be better choice than coal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(natural gas, be less than oil less than coal)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(natural gas, be better choice than coal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(natural gas, be more efficient than coal)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(natural gas, be better choice than coal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Salient(natural gas, be less than oil less than coal)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(natural gas, be better choice than coal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(natural gas, be better than oil)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(natural gas, be better choice than coal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(natural gas, be better than petroleum)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.26
Typical(natural gas, be better choice than coal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(natural gas, be better than coal)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(natural gas, be better choice than coal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(natural gas, be better than coal)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(natural gas, be better choice than coal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(natural gas, be better than coal)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(natural gas, be better choice than coal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(natural gas, be more efficient than coal)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(natural gas, be better choice than coal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(natural gas, be less than oil less than coal)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.26
Typical(natural gas, be better choice than coal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(natural gas, be better than petroleum)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(natural gas, be better choice than coal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(natural gas, be better than oil)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(natural gas, be better choice than coal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(natural gas, be better than petroleum)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.26
Typical(natural gas, be better choice than coal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(natural gas, be better than oil)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(natural gas, be better choice than coal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(natural gas, be better than petroleum)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(natural gas, be better choice than coal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(natural gas, be better than oil)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(natural gas, be better choice than coal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(natural gas, be more efficient than coal)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.26
Typical(natural gas, be better choice than coal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(natural gas, be more efficient than coal)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.26
Typical(natural gas, be better choice than coal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(natural gas, be less than oil less than coal)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(natural gas, be better choice than coal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(natural gas, be better choice than coal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(natural gas, be better choice than coal)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(natural gas, be better choice than coal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(natural gas, be better choice than coal)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(natural gas, be better choice than coal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(fuel oil, be better than coal)