natural gas: be more efficient than coal

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents resource
Weight: 0.72
, mineral
Weight: 0.71
, power plant
Weight: 0.70
, natural
Weight: 0.68
Siblings fuel oil
Weight: 0.81
, oil
Weight: 0.67
, methane
Weight: 0.66
, gasoline
Weight: 0.65
, ethanol
Weight: 0.64

Related properties

Property Similarity
be more efficient than coal 1.00
be better than coal 0.94
be cheaper than coal 0.93
be cleaner than coal 0.92
be less than oil less than coal 0.91
burn cleaner than coal 0.91
be better choice than coal 0.91
be better than coal boilers 0.88
be cheaper than electricity 0.81
be better than other fossil fuels 0.81

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(natural gas, be more efficient than coal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(fuel oil, be better than coal)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(natural gas, be more efficient than coal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(fuel oil, be better than coal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(fuel oil, be better than coal)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(natural gas, be more efficient than coal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(natural gas, be more efficient than coal)

Similarity expansion

0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(natural gas, be more efficient than coal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Salient(natural gas, be less than oil less than coal)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(natural gas, be more efficient than coal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(natural gas, be less than oil less than coal)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(natural gas, be more efficient than coal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(natural gas, be better than coal)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(natural gas, be more efficient than coal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(natural gas, be better than coal)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(natural gas, be more efficient than coal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(natural gas, be better choice than coal)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(natural gas, be more efficient than coal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Salient(natural gas, be better choice than coal)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(natural gas, be more efficient than coal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(natural gas, be better than coal)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(natural gas, be more efficient than coal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(natural gas, be better choice than coal)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(natural gas, be more efficient than coal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(natural gas, be less than oil less than coal)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(natural gas, be more efficient than coal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(natural gas, be better than coal)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(natural gas, be more efficient than coal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Salient(natural gas, be cheaper than electricity)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(natural gas, be more efficient than coal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(natural gas, be better choice than coal)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(natural gas, be more efficient than coal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(natural gas, be cheaper than electricity)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(natural gas, be more efficient than coal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(natural gas, be cheaper than electricity)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(natural gas, be more efficient than coal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(natural gas, be less than oil less than coal)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(natural gas, be more efficient than coal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(natural gas, be cheaper than electricity)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(natural gas, be more efficient than coal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(natural gas, be more efficient than coal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(natural gas, be more efficient than coal)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(natural gas, be more efficient than coal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(natural gas, be more efficient than coal)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(natural gas, be more efficient than coal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(fuel oil, be better than coal)