natural gas: be cheaper than electricity

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents resource
Weight: 0.72
, mineral
Weight: 0.71
, power plant
Weight: 0.70
, natural
Weight: 0.68
Siblings fuel oil
Weight: 0.81
, oil
Weight: 0.67
, methane
Weight: 0.66
, gasoline
Weight: 0.65
, ethanol
Weight: 0.64

Related properties

Property Similarity
be cheaper than electricity 1.00
be cheaper than oil 0.88
be cheaper than coal 0.88
be cheaper compared to diesel 0.85
be cheaper than propane 0.85
be cheaper compared to petrol 0.84
be better than lpg 0.83
be more efficient than coal 0.81
be less than oil less than coal 0.80
be better than gasoline 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(natural gas, be cheaper than electricity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(ethanol, be better than gasoline)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(natural gas, be cheaper than electricity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(ethanol, be better than gasoline) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(ethanol, be better than gasoline)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(natural gas, be cheaper than electricity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Salient(natural gas, be cheaper than electricity)

Similarity expansion

0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(natural gas, be cheaper than electricity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(natural gas, be less than oil less than coal)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.41
Salient(natural gas, be cheaper than electricity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Salient(natural gas, be less than oil less than coal)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(natural gas, be cheaper than electricity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(natural gas, be cheaper than oil)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(natural gas, be cheaper than electricity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(natural gas, be less than oil less than coal)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(natural gas, be cheaper than electricity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(natural gas, be more efficient than coal)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.43
Typical(natural gas, be cheaper than electricity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(natural gas, be more efficient than coal)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.43
Typical(natural gas, be cheaper than electricity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(natural gas, be cheaper than oil)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.43
Typical(natural gas, be cheaper than electricity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(natural gas, be less than oil less than coal)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(natural gas, be cheaper than electricity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(natural gas, be cheaper than oil)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(natural gas, be cheaper than electricity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(natural gas, be more efficient than coal)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.41
Salient(natural gas, be cheaper than electricity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(natural gas, be cheaper than oil)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.41
Salient(natural gas, be cheaper than electricity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(natural gas, be more efficient than coal)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Salient(natural gas, be cheaper than electricity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(natural gas, be cheaper than electricity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(natural gas, be cheaper than electricity)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(natural gas, be cheaper than electricity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(natural gas, be cheaper than electricity)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(natural gas, be cheaper than electricity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(ethanol, be better than gasoline)