natural gas: be better for environment

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents resource
Weight: 0.72
, mineral
Weight: 0.71
, power plant
Weight: 0.70
, natural
Weight: 0.68
Siblings fuel oil
Weight: 0.81
, oil
Weight: 0.67
, methane
Weight: 0.66
, gasoline
Weight: 0.65
, ethanol
Weight: 0.64

Related properties

Property Similarity
be better for environment 1.00
be good for environment 0.96
be bad for environment 0.93
be harmful to environment 0.83

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.55
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(power plant, be good for environment)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(natural gas, be better for environment)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(power plant, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(natural gas, be better for environment)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(natural gas, be better for environment)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(power plant, be bad for environment)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(natural gas, be better for environment)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(power plant, be good for environment)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.48
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(natural gas, be better for environment)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(power plant, be bad for environment)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(natural gas, be better for environment)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(power plant, be good for environment)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(natural gas, be better for environment)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(gasoline, be bad for environment)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(natural gas, be better for environment)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(oil, be bad for environment)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(power plant, be good for environment)
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(natural gas, be better for environment)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(natural gas, be better for environment)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(power plant, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(natural gas, be better for environment)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(natural gas, be better for environment)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(natural gas, be better for environment)
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(gasoline, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(gasoline, be bad for environment)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(natural gas, be better for environment)
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(oil, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(oil, be bad for environment)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(natural gas, be better for environment)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(natural gas, be better for environment)

Similarity expansion

0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.76
Salient(natural gas, be better for environment)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Salient(natural gas, be bad for environment)
0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(natural gas, be better for environment)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(natural gas, be bad for environment)
0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(natural gas, be better for environment)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Plausible(natural gas, be bad for environment)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.46
Typical(natural gas, be better for environment)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(natural gas, be bad for environment)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Salient(natural gas, be better for environment)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(natural gas, be better for environment)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(natural gas, be better for environment)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(natural gas, be better for environment)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(natural gas, be better for environment)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(natural gas, be better for environment)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(power plant, be bad for environment)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(natural gas, be better for environment)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(power plant, be good for environment)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(natural gas, be better for environment)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(gasoline, be bad for environment)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.21
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(natural gas, be better for environment)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(oil, be bad for environment)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.46
Typical(natural gas, be better for environment)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(power plant, be bad for environment)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.46
Typical(natural gas, be better for environment)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(power plant, be good for environment)