natural gas: is renewable

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents resource
Weight: 0.72
, mineral
Weight: 0.71
, power plant
Weight: 0.70
, natural
Weight: 0.68
Siblings fuel oil
Weight: 0.81
, oil
Weight: 0.67
, methane
Weight: 0.66
, gasoline
Weight: 0.65
, ethanol
Weight: 0.64

Related properties

Property Similarity
is renewable 1.00
be renewable 1.00
is renewable energy 0.98
is non renewable 0.96
is non renewable energy 0.95
is energy 0.79
is nonrenewable resource 0.77
be considered nonrenewable resource 0.76
is non energy 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.64
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(resource, is renewable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(natural gas, is renewable)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(natural gas, is renewable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(resource, is renewable)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.21
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(natural gas, is renewable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(resource, is renewable)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(natural gas, is renewable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(gasoline, is non renewable)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(natural gas, is renewable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(oil, is non renewable)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(natural gas, is renewable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(gasoline, is renewable)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(natural gas, is renewable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(gasoline, is nonrenewable resource)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.22
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(natural gas, is renewable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(ethanol, is renewable)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.15
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(natural gas, is renewable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(oil, is nonrenewable resource)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.42
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(resource, is renewable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(natural gas, is renewable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(natural gas, is renewable)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(natural gas, is renewable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(ethanol, is renewable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(ethanol, is renewable)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(natural gas, is renewable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(gasoline, is renewable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(gasoline, is renewable)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(natural gas, is renewable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(gasoline, is non renewable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(gasoline, is non renewable)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(natural gas, is renewable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(oil, is non renewable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(oil, is non renewable)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(natural gas, is renewable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(oil, is nonrenewable resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(oil, is nonrenewable resource)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(natural gas, is renewable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(gasoline, is nonrenewable resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(gasoline, is nonrenewable resource)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(natural gas, is renewable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(natural gas, is renewable)

Similarity expansion

0.81
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.45
Typical(natural gas, is renewable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(natural gas, is renewable energy)
0.81
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(natural gas, is renewable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(natural gas, is non renewable energy)
0.81
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(natural gas, is renewable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Salient(natural gas, is non renewable energy)
0.81
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(natural gas, is renewable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(natural gas, is non renewable)
0.81
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(natural gas, is renewable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(natural gas, is non renewable energy)
0.81
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(natural gas, is renewable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Salient(natural gas, is non renewable)
0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(natural gas, is renewable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(natural gas, is non renewable)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(natural gas, is renewable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(natural gas, is renewable energy)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(natural gas, is renewable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Salient(natural gas, is renewable energy)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(natural gas, is renewable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(natural gas, is renewable energy)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.45
Typical(natural gas, is renewable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(natural gas, is non renewable energy)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.45
Typical(natural gas, is renewable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(natural gas, is non renewable)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.45
Typical(natural gas, is renewable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(natural gas, is energy)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(natural gas, is renewable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(natural gas, is non energy)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(natural gas, is renewable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Salient(natural gas, is non energy)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(natural gas, is renewable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(natural gas, is non energy)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(natural gas, is renewable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(natural gas, is energy)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(natural gas, is renewable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(natural gas, is energy)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(natural gas, is renewable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Salient(natural gas, is energy)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(natural gas, is renewable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(natural gas, is nonrenewable resource)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.45
Typical(natural gas, is renewable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(natural gas, is non energy)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(natural gas, is renewable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(natural gas, be considered nonrenewable resource)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.45
Typical(natural gas, is renewable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(natural gas, be considered nonrenewable resource)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(natural gas, is renewable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(natural gas, be considered nonrenewable resource)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(natural gas, is renewable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(natural gas, is nonrenewable resource)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.45
Typical(natural gas, is renewable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(natural gas, is nonrenewable resource)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(natural gas, is renewable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(natural gas, be considered nonrenewable resource)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(natural gas, is renewable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(natural gas, is nonrenewable resource)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(natural gas, is renewable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(natural gas, is renewable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(natural gas, is renewable)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(natural gas, is renewable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(natural gas, is renewable)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.15
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(natural gas, is renewable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(resource, is renewable)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(natural gas, is renewable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(gasoline, is non renewable)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(natural gas, is renewable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(ethanol, is renewable)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.23
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(natural gas, is renewable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(oil, is non renewable)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(natural gas, is renewable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(gasoline, is nonrenewable resource)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.19
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(natural gas, is renewable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(gasoline, is renewable)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.23
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(natural gas, is renewable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(oil, is nonrenewable resource)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.24
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
Typical(natural gas, is renewable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(resource, is renewable)