naturalist: has quality bad

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents biologist
Weight: 0.64
, resident
Weight: 0.55
, scientist
Weight: 0.52
, person
Weight: 0.51
Siblings charles darwin
Weight: 0.64
, henry david thoreau
Weight: 0.59
, alfred russel wallace
Weight: 0.52
, botanist
Weight: 0.34
, ecologist
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality bad 1.00
has quality good 0.96
has quality questions 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(naturalist, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Salient(naturalist, has quality bad)

Similarity expansion

0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(naturalist, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(naturalist, has quality good)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(naturalist, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(naturalist, has quality questions)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(naturalist, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(naturalist, has quality good)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(naturalist, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(naturalist, has quality questions)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(naturalist, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(naturalist, has quality good)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.46
Salient(naturalist, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(naturalist, has quality good)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.46
Salient(naturalist, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(naturalist, has quality questions)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(naturalist, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(naturalist, has quality questions)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Salient(naturalist, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(naturalist, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(naturalist, has quality bad)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(naturalist, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(naturalist, has quality bad)