nebraska: be in black

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents state
Weight: 0.60
, program
Weight: 0.58
, area
Weight: 0.57
, place
Weight: 0.55
, team
Weight: 0.55
Siblings texas
Weight: 0.64
, kansas
Weight: 0.35
, wisconsin
Weight: 0.35
, wyoming
Weight: 0.35
, arkansas
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in black 1.00
be in white 0.92
has color black 0.91
has color white 0.85

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(nebraska, be in black)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(wisconsin, has color white)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(nebraska, be in black)
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(wisconsin, has color white)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(wisconsin, has color white)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(nebraska, be in black)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Salient(nebraska, be in black)

Similarity expansion

0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(nebraska, be in black)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(nebraska, be in white)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.30
Salient(nebraska, be in black)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Salient(nebraska, be in white)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(nebraska, be in black)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(nebraska, be in white)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.50
Typical(nebraska, be in black)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(nebraska, has color black)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(nebraska, be in black)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(nebraska, has color black)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.50
Typical(nebraska, be in black)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(nebraska, be in white)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.30
Salient(nebraska, be in black)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Salient(nebraska, has color black)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.50
Typical(nebraska, be in black)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(nebraska, has color white)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(nebraska, be in black)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(nebraska, has color black)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(nebraska, be in black)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(nebraska, has color white)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.30
Salient(nebraska, be in black)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(nebraska, has color white)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(nebraska, be in black)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(nebraska, has color white)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
Salient(nebraska, be in black)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(nebraska, be in black)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(nebraska, be in black)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(nebraska, be in black)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(nebraska, be in black)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(nebraska, be in black)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(wisconsin, has color white)