wisconsin: has color white

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents area
Weight: 0.58
, state
Weight: 0.57
, university
Weight: 0.56
, republican
Weight: 0.56
Siblings ohio
Weight: 0.66
, pennsylvania
Weight: 0.60
, minneapolis
Weight: 0.55
, frozen custard
Weight: 0.46
, michigan
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
has color white 1.00
has color blue 0.94
is blue state 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.61
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(state, has color blue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(wisconsin, has color white)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(wisconsin, has color white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(state, has color blue)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(wisconsin, has color white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(state, has color blue)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(wisconsin, has color white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(michigan, is blue state)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(wisconsin, has color white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(michigan, has color blue)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(state, has color blue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(wisconsin, has color white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(wisconsin, has color white)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(wisconsin, has color white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(michigan, has color blue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(michigan, has color blue)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(wisconsin, has color white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(michigan, is blue state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(michigan, is blue state)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(wisconsin, has color white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Salient(wisconsin, has color white)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(wisconsin, has color white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(wisconsin, has color blue)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(wisconsin, has color white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(wisconsin, is blue state)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.61
Salient(wisconsin, has color white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Salient(wisconsin, is blue state)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.61
Salient(wisconsin, has color white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(wisconsin, has color blue)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(wisconsin, has color white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(wisconsin, has color blue)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(wisconsin, has color white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(wisconsin, is blue state)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(wisconsin, has color white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(wisconsin, has color blue)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(wisconsin, has color white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(wisconsin, is blue state)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Salient(wisconsin, has color white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(wisconsin, has color white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(wisconsin, has color white)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(wisconsin, has color white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(wisconsin, has color white)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.19
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(wisconsin, has color white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(state, has color blue)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(wisconsin, has color white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(michigan, has color blue)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(wisconsin, has color white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(michigan, is blue state)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.27
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(wisconsin, has color white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(state, has color blue)