negotiable instrument: has quality good

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents instrument
Weight: 0.83
, document
Weight: 0.66
, topic
Weight: 0.61
, form
Weight: 0.59
Siblings note
Weight: 0.63
, bearer
Weight: 0.55
, cheque
Weight: 0.49
, debt instrument
Weight: 0.40
, musical instrument
Weight: 0.39

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality good 1.00
take good 0.77
has quality definition 0.76
has quality questions 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.60
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(instrument, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(negotiable instrument, has quality good)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(negotiable instrument, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(instrument, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.25
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(negotiable instrument, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(instrument, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(negotiable instrument, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(musical instrument, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(negotiable instrument, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(debt instrument, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(negotiable instrument, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(note, take good)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(negotiable instrument, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(debt instrument, has quality definition)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(instrument, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(negotiable instrument, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(negotiable instrument, has quality good)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(negotiable instrument, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(debt instrument, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(debt instrument, has quality good)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(negotiable instrument, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(musical instrument, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(musical instrument, has quality good)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(negotiable instrument, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(debt instrument, has quality definition) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(debt instrument, has quality definition)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(negotiable instrument, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(note, take good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(note, take good)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(negotiable instrument, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(negotiable instrument, has quality good)

Similarity expansion

0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(negotiable instrument, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(negotiable instrument, has quality questions)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(negotiable instrument, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(negotiable instrument, has quality questions)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(negotiable instrument, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(negotiable instrument, has quality questions)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(negotiable instrument, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(negotiable instrument, has quality questions)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(negotiable instrument, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(negotiable instrument, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(negotiable instrument, has quality good)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(negotiable instrument, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(negotiable instrument, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.14
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(negotiable instrument, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(instrument, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(negotiable instrument, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(debt instrument, has quality definition)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(negotiable instrument, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(note, take good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(negotiable instrument, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(debt instrument, has quality good)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(negotiable instrument, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(musical instrument, has quality good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(negotiable instrument, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(instrument, has quality good)