neighbor: be wifi without password

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents victim
Weight: 0.70
, family member
Weight: 0.68
, friend
Weight: 0.65
, parent
Weight: 0.62
, person
Weight: 0.61
Siblings husband
Weight: 0.66
, wife
Weight: 0.65
, homeowner
Weight: 0.54
, cousin
Weight: 0.36
, mother
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
be wifi without password 1.00
is wifi password 0.99
is password 0.92
is wifi 0.86

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(neighbor, be wifi without password) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Salient(neighbor, be wifi without password)

Similarity expansion

0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(neighbor, be wifi without password) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(neighbor, is wifi password)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.04
Salient(neighbor, be wifi without password) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Salient(neighbor, is wifi password)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(neighbor, be wifi without password) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(neighbor, is wifi password)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(neighbor, be wifi without password) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(neighbor, is wifi)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(neighbor, be wifi without password) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(neighbor, is wifi)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.04
Salient(neighbor, be wifi without password) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Salient(neighbor, is wifi)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(neighbor, be wifi without password) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(neighbor, is password)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.04
Salient(neighbor, be wifi without password) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Salient(neighbor, is password)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.25
Typical(neighbor, be wifi without password) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(neighbor, is wifi password)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.25
Typical(neighbor, be wifi without password) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(neighbor, is wifi)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(neighbor, be wifi without password) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(neighbor, is password)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.25
Typical(neighbor, be wifi without password) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(neighbor, is password)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.04
Salient(neighbor, be wifi without password) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(neighbor, be wifi without password) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(neighbor, be wifi without password)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(neighbor, be wifi without password) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(neighbor, be wifi without password)