nerd: have nerd voices

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents thing
Weight: 0.57
, term
Weight: 0.55
, insult
Weight: 0.54
, word
Weight: 0.52
, man
Weight: 0.51
Siblings fart
Weight: 0.33
, asshole
Weight: 0.33
, jock
Weight: 0.33
, chick
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
have nerd voices 1.00
have nerdy voices 0.93
be vs geek lyrics 0.83
is nerds 0.83
is nerds nerds 0.83
be called nerds 0.83
called nerds 0.83
look like nerds 0.82
is stereotypical nerds 0.82
be vs geek 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(nerd, have nerd voices)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(jock, is stereotypical nerds)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.22
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(nerd, have nerd voices)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(jock, is nerds)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(nerd, have nerd voices)
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(jock, is nerds)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(jock, is nerds)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(nerd, have nerd voices)
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(jock, is stereotypical nerds)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(jock, is stereotypical nerds)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(nerd, have nerd voices)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Salient(nerd, have nerd voices)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(nerd, have nerd voices)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(nerd, be vs geek lyrics)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.08
Typical(nerd, have nerd voices)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(nerd, is nerds)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(nerd, have nerd voices)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(nerd, be called nerds)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.08
Typical(nerd, have nerd voices)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(nerd, look like nerds)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(nerd, have nerd voices)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(nerd, is nerds nerds)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(nerd, have nerd voices)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(nerd, called nerds)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(nerd, have nerd voices)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(nerd, is nerds)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(nerd, have nerd voices)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(nerd, look like nerds)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(nerd, have nerd voices)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(nerd, look like nerds)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(nerd, have nerd voices)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(nerd, be vs geek)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.08
Typical(nerd, have nerd voices)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(nerd, called nerds)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.08
Typical(nerd, have nerd voices)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(nerd, is nerds nerds)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(nerd, have nerd voices)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(nerd, be vs geek lyrics)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(nerd, have nerd voices)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(nerd, is nerds)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(nerd, have nerd voices)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(nerd, called nerds)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(nerd, have nerd voices)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(nerd, is nerds nerds)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.60
Salient(nerd, have nerd voices)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Salient(nerd, look like nerds)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.60
Salient(nerd, have nerd voices)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Salient(nerd, called nerds)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.60
Salient(nerd, have nerd voices)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Salient(nerd, is nerds)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(nerd, have nerd voices)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(nerd, be called nerds)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.60
Salient(nerd, have nerd voices)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Salient(nerd, be called nerds)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.60
Salient(nerd, have nerd voices)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Salient(nerd, be vs geek lyrics)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.60
Salient(nerd, have nerd voices)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(nerd, is nerds nerds)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(nerd, have nerd voices)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(nerd, be vs geek)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.08
Typical(nerd, have nerd voices)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(nerd, be vs geek)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.60
Salient(nerd, have nerd voices)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(nerd, be vs geek)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.08
Typical(nerd, have nerd voices)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(nerd, be called nerds)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.08
Typical(nerd, have nerd voices)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(nerd, be vs geek lyrics)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Salient(nerd, have nerd voices)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(nerd, have nerd voices)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(nerd, have nerd voices)

Typical implies Plausible

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(nerd, have nerd voices)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(nerd, have nerd voices)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(nerd, have nerd voices)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(jock, is nerds)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(nerd, have nerd voices)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(jock, is stereotypical nerds)