network: be considered complex adaptive systems

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents network device
Weight: 0.66
, security system
Weight: 0.63
, country
Weight: 0.62
, web site
Weight: 0.62
Siblings computer network
Weight: 0.83
, cartoon network
Weight: 0.83
, internet service provider
Weight: 0.72
, neural network
Weight: 0.67
, backbone
Weight: 0.65

Related properties

Property Similarity
be considered complex adaptive systems 1.00
be considered adaptive systems 0.97
be considered complex systems 0.92
be considered systems 0.85

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.12
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(network, be considered complex adaptive systems)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(neural network, be considered complex adaptive systems)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.10
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(network, be considered complex adaptive systems)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(neural network, be considered adaptive systems)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.10
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(network, be considered complex adaptive systems)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(neural network, be considered complex systems)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.10
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(network, be considered complex adaptive systems)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(neural network, be considered systems)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.60
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(network, be considered complex adaptive systems)
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(neural network, be considered complex adaptive systems)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(neural network, be considered complex adaptive systems)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(network, be considered complex adaptive systems)
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(neural network, be considered adaptive systems)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(neural network, be considered adaptive systems)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(network, be considered complex adaptive systems)
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(neural network, be considered complex systems)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(neural network, be considered complex systems)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(network, be considered complex adaptive systems)
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(neural network, be considered systems)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(neural network, be considered systems)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(network, be considered complex adaptive systems)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Salient(network, be considered complex adaptive systems)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
Salient(network, be considered complex adaptive systems)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(network, be considered complex adaptive systems)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(network, be considered complex adaptive systems)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(network, be considered complex adaptive systems)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(network, be considered complex adaptive systems)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(network, be considered complex adaptive systems)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(neural network, be considered complex adaptive systems)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(network, be considered complex adaptive systems)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(neural network, be considered adaptive systems)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(network, be considered complex adaptive systems)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(neural network, be considered complex systems)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(network, be considered complex adaptive systems)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(neural network, be considered systems)