neural network: be considered systems

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents algorithm
Weight: 0.75
, system
Weight: 0.67
, network
Weight: 0.67
, brain
Weight: 0.65
Siblings human brain
Weight: 0.72
, neuron
Weight: 0.48
, computer network
Weight: 0.39
, cartoon network
Weight: 0.37
, limbic system
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be considered systems 1.00
be considered complex systems 0.92
be considered adaptive systems 0.87
be considered complex adaptive systems 0.85

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.57
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(network, be considered complex adaptive systems)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(neural network, be considered systems)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(neural network, be considered systems)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(network, be considered complex adaptive systems)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.10
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(neural network, be considered systems)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(network, be considered complex adaptive systems)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(network, be considered complex adaptive systems)
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(neural network, be considered systems)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(neural network, be considered systems)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(neural network, be considered systems)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Salient(neural network, be considered systems)

Similarity expansion

0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.00
Typical(neural network, be considered systems)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(neural network, be considered complex systems)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(neural network, be considered systems)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(neural network, be considered complex systems)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.00
Typical(neural network, be considered systems)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(neural network, be considered adaptive systems)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(neural network, be considered systems)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(neural network, be considered adaptive systems)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(neural network, be considered systems)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(neural network, be considered complex adaptive systems)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.00
Typical(neural network, be considered systems)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(neural network, be considered complex adaptive systems)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(neural network, be considered systems)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(neural network, be considered complex systems)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(neural network, be considered systems)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(neural network, be considered adaptive systems)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(neural network, be considered systems)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(neural network, be considered complex adaptive systems)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.44
Salient(neural network, be considered systems)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Salient(neural network, be considered complex systems)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.44
Salient(neural network, be considered systems)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Salient(neural network, be considered adaptive systems)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.44
Salient(neural network, be considered systems)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Salient(neural network, be considered complex adaptive systems)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Salient(neural network, be considered systems)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(neural network, be considered systems)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(neural network, be considered systems)

Typical implies Plausible

0.48
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(neural network, be considered systems)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(neural network, be considered systems)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(neural network, be considered systems)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(network, be considered complex adaptive systems)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.00
Typical(neural network, be considered systems)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(network, be considered complex adaptive systems)