network: is non linear

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents network device
Weight: 0.66
, security system
Weight: 0.63
, country
Weight: 0.62
, web site
Weight: 0.62
Siblings computer network
Weight: 0.83
, cartoon network
Weight: 0.83
, internet service provider
Weight: 0.72
, neural network
Weight: 0.67
, backbone
Weight: 0.65

Related properties

Property Similarity
is non linear 1.00
is non convex 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(network, is non linear) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(neural network, is non linear)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(network, is non linear) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(neural network, is non convex)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(network, is non linear) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
Remarkable(neural network, is non convex) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(neural network, is non convex)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(network, is non linear) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
Remarkable(neural network, is non linear) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(neural network, is non linear)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(network, is non linear) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Salient(network, is non linear)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(network, is non linear) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(network, is non convex)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.12
Salient(network, is non linear) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Salient(network, is non convex)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.13
Remarkable(network, is non linear) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(network, is non convex)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.35
Typical(network, is non linear) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(network, is non convex)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
Salient(network, is non linear) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(network, is non linear) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(network, is non linear)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(network, is non linear) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(network, is non linear)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(network, is non linear) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(neural network, is non linear)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(network, is non linear) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(neural network, is non convex)