new hampshire: be called new hampshire

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents new england
Weight: 0.75
, new york
Weight: 0.73
, massachusetts
Weight: 0.64
, maine
Weight: 0.56
Siblings alabama
Weight: 0.65
, manchester
Weight: 0.61
, mississippi
Weight: 0.57
, lake champlain
Weight: 0.56
, new york city
Weight: 0.40

Related properties

Property Similarity
be called new hampshire 1.00
be called hampshire 0.97
was named new hampshire 0.93
was named hampshire 0.90
be called new england 0.81
was originally called new amsterdam 0.75
be called york city 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.53
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(maine, be called new england) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(new hampshire, be called new hampshire)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(massachusetts, be called new england) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(new hampshire, be called new hampshire)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(new england, be called new england) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(new hampshire, be called new hampshire)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(new york, was originally called new amsterdam) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(new hampshire, be called new hampshire)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(new hampshire, be called new hampshire) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(new england, be called new england)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(new hampshire, be called new hampshire) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(massachusetts, be called new england)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(new hampshire, be called new hampshire) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(new york, was originally called new amsterdam)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(new hampshire, be called new hampshire) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(maine, be called new england)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.14
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(new hampshire, be called new hampshire) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(maine, be called new england)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(new hampshire, be called new hampshire) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(massachusetts, be called new england)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.11
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(new hampshire, be called new hampshire) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(new york, was originally called new amsterdam)
0.00
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.01
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(new hampshire, be called new hampshire) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(new england, be called new england)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(maine, be called new england) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(new hampshire, be called new hampshire) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(new hampshire, be called new hampshire)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(massachusetts, be called new england) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(new hampshire, be called new hampshire) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(new hampshire, be called new hampshire)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(new england, be called new england) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(new hampshire, be called new hampshire) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(new hampshire, be called new hampshire)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(new york, was originally called new amsterdam) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(new hampshire, be called new hampshire) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(new hampshire, be called new hampshire)

Salient implies Plausible

0.16
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(new hampshire, be called new hampshire) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Salient(new hampshire, be called new hampshire)

Similarity expansion

0.82
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(new hampshire, be called new hampshire) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(new hampshire, be called hampshire)
0.81
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.01
Typical(new hampshire, be called new hampshire) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(new hampshire, be called hampshire)
0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(new hampshire, be called new hampshire) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(new hampshire, was named new hampshire)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(new hampshire, be called new hampshire) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(new hampshire, was named hampshire)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.01
Typical(new hampshire, be called new hampshire) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(new hampshire, was named new hampshire)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(new hampshire, be called new hampshire) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(new hampshire, be called hampshire)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.01
Typical(new hampshire, be called new hampshire) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(new hampshire, was named hampshire)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.01
Typical(new hampshire, be called new hampshire) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(new hampshire, be called new england)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(new hampshire, be called new hampshire) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(new hampshire, be called new england)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.51
Salient(new hampshire, be called new hampshire) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Salient(new hampshire, be called hampshire)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(new hampshire, be called new hampshire) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(new hampshire, be called new england)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(new hampshire, be called new hampshire) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(new hampshire, was named new hampshire)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(new hampshire, be called new hampshire) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(new hampshire, was named hampshire)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.51
Salient(new hampshire, be called new hampshire) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(new hampshire, was named new hampshire)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.51
Salient(new hampshire, be called new hampshire) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Salient(new hampshire, was named hampshire)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.51
Salient(new hampshire, be called new hampshire) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Salient(new hampshire, be called new england)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
Salient(new hampshire, be called new hampshire) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(new hampshire, be called new hampshire) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(new hampshire, be called new hampshire)

Typical implies Plausible

0.48
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(new hampshire, be called new hampshire) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(new hampshire, be called new hampshire)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(new hampshire, be called new hampshire) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(new england, be called new england)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(new hampshire, be called new hampshire) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(massachusetts, be called new england)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(new hampshire, be called new hampshire) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(new york, was originally called new amsterdam)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.23
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(new hampshire, be called new hampshire) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(maine, be called new england)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.01
Typical(new hampshire, be called new hampshire) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(new england, be called new england)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.01
Typical(new hampshire, be called new hampshire) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(massachusetts, be called new england)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.01
Typical(new hampshire, be called new hampshire) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(new york, was originally called new amsterdam)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.23
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.01
Typical(new hampshire, be called new hampshire) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(maine, be called new england)