new hampshire: was named new hampshire

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents new england
Weight: 0.75
, new york
Weight: 0.73
, massachusetts
Weight: 0.64
, maine
Weight: 0.56
Siblings alabama
Weight: 0.65
, manchester
Weight: 0.61
, mississippi
Weight: 0.57
, lake champlain
Weight: 0.56
, new york city
Weight: 0.40

Related properties

Property Similarity
was named new hampshire 1.00
was named hampshire 0.98
be called new hampshire 0.93
be called hampshire 0.90
was named 0.85
is named 0.84
is named after 0.82
be called new england 0.75
was originally called new amsterdam 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.54
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(maine, was named) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(new hampshire, was named new hampshire)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(maine, be called new england) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(new hampshire, was named new hampshire)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(new york, was originally called new amsterdam) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(new hampshire, was named new hampshire)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(massachusetts, be called new england) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(new hampshire, was named new hampshire)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(new england, be called new england) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(new hampshire, was named new hampshire)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(new hampshire, was named new hampshire) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(new england, be called new england)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(new hampshire, was named new hampshire) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(massachusetts, be called new england)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(new hampshire, was named new hampshire) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(maine, was named)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(new hampshire, was named new hampshire) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(new york, was originally called new amsterdam)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(new hampshire, was named new hampshire) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(maine, be called new england)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.16
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(new hampshire, was named new hampshire) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(maine, was named)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(new hampshire, was named new hampshire) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(maine, be called new england)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(new hampshire, was named new hampshire) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(massachusetts, be called new england)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.13
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(new hampshire, was named new hampshire) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(new york, was originally called new amsterdam)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.03
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(new hampshire, was named new hampshire) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(new england, be called new england)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(new hampshire, was named new hampshire) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(lake champlain, was named)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(maine, was named) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(new hampshire, was named new hampshire) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(new hampshire, was named new hampshire)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(maine, be called new england) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(new hampshire, was named new hampshire) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(new hampshire, was named new hampshire)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(new york, was originally called new amsterdam) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(new hampshire, was named new hampshire) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(new hampshire, was named new hampshire)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(massachusetts, be called new england) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(new hampshire, was named new hampshire) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(new hampshire, was named new hampshire)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(new england, be called new england) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(new hampshire, was named new hampshire) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(new hampshire, was named new hampshire)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(new hampshire, was named new hampshire) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(lake champlain, was named) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(lake champlain, was named)

Salient implies Plausible

0.16
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(new hampshire, was named new hampshire) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(new hampshire, was named new hampshire)

Similarity expansion

0.82
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(new hampshire, was named new hampshire) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(new hampshire, was named hampshire)
0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.08
Typical(new hampshire, was named new hampshire) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(new hampshire, be called new hampshire)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(new hampshire, was named new hampshire) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(new hampshire, be called new hampshire)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.08
Typical(new hampshire, was named new hampshire) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(new hampshire, was named hampshire)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.08
Typical(new hampshire, was named new hampshire) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(new hampshire, be called hampshire)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(new hampshire, was named new hampshire) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(new hampshire, be called hampshire)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(new hampshire, was named new hampshire) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(new hampshire, was named)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(new hampshire, was named new hampshire) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(new hampshire, be called new hampshire)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(new hampshire, was named new hampshire) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(new hampshire, is named)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.08
Typical(new hampshire, was named new hampshire) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(new hampshire, was named)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(new hampshire, was named new hampshire) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(new hampshire, is named after)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.08
Typical(new hampshire, was named new hampshire) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(new hampshire, is named)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(new hampshire, was named new hampshire) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(new hampshire, be called hampshire)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(new hampshire, was named new hampshire) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(new hampshire, was named hampshire)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(new hampshire, was named new hampshire) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Salient(new hampshire, was named hampshire)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.08
Typical(new hampshire, was named new hampshire) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(new hampshire, is named after)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(new hampshire, was named new hampshire) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Salient(new hampshire, be called new hampshire)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.08
Typical(new hampshire, was named new hampshire) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(new hampshire, be called new england)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(new hampshire, was named new hampshire) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Salient(new hampshire, be called hampshire)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(new hampshire, was named new hampshire) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(new hampshire, be called new england)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(new hampshire, was named new hampshire) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(new hampshire, was named)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(new hampshire, was named new hampshire) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(new hampshire, is named)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(new hampshire, was named new hampshire) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Salient(new hampshire, was named)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(new hampshire, was named new hampshire) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(new hampshire, be called new england)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(new hampshire, was named new hampshire) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Salient(new hampshire, is named)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(new hampshire, was named new hampshire) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(new hampshire, is named after)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(new hampshire, was named new hampshire) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Salient(new hampshire, is named after)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(new hampshire, was named new hampshire) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Salient(new hampshire, be called new england)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(new hampshire, was named new hampshire) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(new hampshire, was named new hampshire) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(new hampshire, was named new hampshire)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(new hampshire, was named new hampshire) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(new hampshire, was named new hampshire)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(new hampshire, was named new hampshire) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(new england, be called new england)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(new hampshire, was named new hampshire) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(massachusetts, be called new england)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(new hampshire, was named new hampshire) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(new york, was originally called new amsterdam)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(new hampshire, was named new hampshire) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(maine, was named)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(new hampshire, was named new hampshire) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(maine, be called new england)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(new hampshire, was named new hampshire) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(lake champlain, was named)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.08
Typical(new hampshire, was named new hampshire) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(new england, be called new england)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.08
Typical(new hampshire, was named new hampshire) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(massachusetts, be called new england)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.08
Typical(new hampshire, was named new hampshire) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(new york, was originally called new amsterdam)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.08
Typical(new hampshire, was named new hampshire) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(maine, was named)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.08
Typical(new hampshire, was named new hampshire) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(maine, be called new england)