new hampshire: is named after

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents new england
Weight: 0.75
, new york
Weight: 0.73
, massachusetts
Weight: 0.64
, maine
Weight: 0.56
Siblings alabama
Weight: 0.65
, manchester
Weight: 0.61
, mississippi
Weight: 0.57
, lake champlain
Weight: 0.56
, new york city
Weight: 0.40

Related properties

Property Similarity
is named after 1.00
was named 0.94
is named 0.93
was named new hampshire 0.82
was named hampshire 0.81
was chosen for name 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.61
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(maine, was named) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(new hampshire, is named after)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(new hampshire, is named after) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(maine, was named)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.18
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(new hampshire, is named after) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(maine, was named)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(new hampshire, is named after) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(lake champlain, was named)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(maine, was named) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(new hampshire, is named after) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(new hampshire, is named after)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(new hampshire, is named after) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(lake champlain, was named) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(lake champlain, was named)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(new hampshire, is named after) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Salient(new hampshire, is named after)

Similarity expansion

0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(new hampshire, is named after) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(new hampshire, was named)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(new hampshire, is named after) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(new hampshire, is named)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.07
Typical(new hampshire, is named after) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(new hampshire, was named)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.07
Typical(new hampshire, is named after) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(new hampshire, is named)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(new hampshire, is named after) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(new hampshire, was named new hampshire)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(new hampshire, is named after) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(new hampshire, was named)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(new hampshire, is named after) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(new hampshire, was named hampshire)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(new hampshire, is named after) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(new hampshire, was chosen for name)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(new hampshire, is named after) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(new hampshire, is named)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.07
Typical(new hampshire, is named after) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(new hampshire, was named new hampshire)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.58
Salient(new hampshire, is named after) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Salient(new hampshire, was named)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.07
Typical(new hampshire, is named after) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(new hampshire, was named hampshire)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.58
Salient(new hampshire, is named after) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Salient(new hampshire, is named)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(new hampshire, is named after) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(new hampshire, was named new hampshire)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(new hampshire, is named after) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(new hampshire, was named hampshire)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.58
Salient(new hampshire, is named after) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Salient(new hampshire, was named hampshire)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.58
Salient(new hampshire, is named after) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(new hampshire, was named new hampshire)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.58
Salient(new hampshire, is named after) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(new hampshire, was chosen for name)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(new hampshire, is named after) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(new hampshire, was chosen for name)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.07
Typical(new hampshire, is named after) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(new hampshire, was chosen for name)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
Salient(new hampshire, is named after) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(new hampshire, is named after) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(new hampshire, is named after)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(new hampshire, is named after) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(new hampshire, is named after)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.19
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(new hampshire, is named after) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(maine, was named)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(new hampshire, is named after) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(lake champlain, was named)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.19
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.07
Typical(new hampshire, is named after) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(maine, was named)