maine: was named

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents new england
Weight: 0.67
, new hampshire
Weight: 0.64
, new york
Weight: 0.61
, state
Weight: 0.57
Siblings vermont
Weight: 0.36
, connecticut
Weight: 0.35
, massachusetts
Weight: 0.35
, las vegas
Weight: 0.34
, maryland
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
was named 1.00
was named maine 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.34
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(new hampshire, was named) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(maine, was named)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(maine, was named) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(new hampshire, was named)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.20
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(maine, was named) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(new hampshire, was named)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(maine, was named) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(connecticut, was named)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(new hampshire, was named) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(maine, was named) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(maine, was named)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(maine, was named) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(connecticut, was named) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(connecticut, was named)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(maine, was named) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(maine, was named)

Similarity expansion

0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(maine, was named) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(maine, was named maine)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(maine, was named) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(maine, was named maine)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(maine, was named) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(maine, was named maine)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(maine, was named) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(maine, was named maine)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(maine, was named) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(maine, was named) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(maine, was named)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(maine, was named) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(maine, was named)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.49
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(maine, was named) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(new hampshire, was named)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(maine, was named) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(connecticut, was named)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.48
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(maine, was named) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(new hampshire, was named)