maine: was named maine

Related concepts

Parents	new england Weight: 0.67 , new hampshire Weight: 0.64 , new york Weight: 0.61 , state Weight: 0.57
Siblings	vermont Weight: 0.36 , connecticut Weight: 0.35 , massachusetts Weight: 0.35 , las vegas Weight: 0.34 , maryland Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property	Similarity
was named maine	1.00
be called maine	0.94
was named	0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.32

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.23

Plausible(new hampshire, was named) ⋁

Evidence: 0.48

¬ Typical(maine, was named maine)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.57

Plausible(maine, was named maine) ⋁

Evidence: 0.23

¬ Plausible(new hampshire, was named)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.09

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.20
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.84

¬ Remarkable(maine, was named maine) ⋁

Evidence: 0.95

¬ Remarkable(new hampshire, was named)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.03

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.84

¬ Remarkable(maine, was named maine) ⋁

Evidence: 0.87

¬ Remarkable(connecticut, was named)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.30

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.23

Plausible(new hampshire, was named) ⋁

Evidence: 0.84

Remarkable(maine, was named maine) ⋁

Evidence: 0.57

¬ Plausible(maine, was named maine)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.57

Plausible(maine, was named maine) ⋁

Evidence: 0.87

Remarkable(connecticut, was named) ⋁

Evidence: 0.32

¬ Plausible(connecticut, was named)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.57

Plausible(maine, was named maine) ⋁

Evidence: 0.76

¬ Salient(maine, was named maine)

Similarity expansion

0.69

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.84

Remarkable(maine, was named maine) ⋁

Evidence: 0.88

¬ Remarkable(maine, be called maine)

0.66

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.76

Salient(maine, was named maine) ⋁

Evidence: 0.74

¬ Salient(maine, be called maine)

0.64

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.48

Typical(maine, was named maine) ⋁

Evidence: 0.39

¬ Typical(maine, be called maine)

0.62

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.57

Plausible(maine, was named maine) ⋁

Evidence: 0.52

¬ Plausible(maine, be called maine)

0.59

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.84

Remarkable(maine, was named maine) ⋁

Evidence: 0.69

¬ Remarkable(maine, was named)

0.54

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.76

Salient(maine, was named maine) ⋁

Evidence: 0.72

¬ Salient(maine, was named)

0.48

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.57

Plausible(maine, was named maine) ⋁

Evidence: 0.61

¬ Plausible(maine, was named)

0.44

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.48

Typical(maine, was named maine) ⋁

Evidence: 0.63

¬ Typical(maine, was named)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.76

Salient(maine, was named maine) ⋁

Evidence: 0.48

¬ Typical(maine, was named maine) ⋁

Evidence: 0.84

¬ Remarkable(maine, was named maine)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.57

Plausible(maine, was named maine) ⋁

Evidence: 0.48

¬ Typical(maine, was named maine)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.38

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.84

¬ Remarkable(maine, was named maine) ⋁

Evidence: 0.05

¬ Typical(new hampshire, was named)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.84

¬ Remarkable(maine, was named maine) ⋁

Evidence: 0.16

¬ Typical(connecticut, was named)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.36

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.48

Typical(maine, was named maine) ⋁

Evidence: 0.05

¬ Typical(new hampshire, was named)