new hampshire: have first primary

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents new england
Weight: 0.75
, new york
Weight: 0.73
, massachusetts
Weight: 0.64
, maine
Weight: 0.56
Siblings alabama
Weight: 0.65
, manchester
Weight: 0.61
, mississippi
Weight: 0.57
, lake champlain
Weight: 0.56
, new york city
Weight: 0.40

Related properties

Property Similarity
have first primary 1.00
is first primary 0.99
have primary 0.95
is primary 0.94
is primary important 0.92
hold first two primary elections 0.86
hold two primary elections 0.81
have considered important primaries 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(new hampshire, have first primary)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(new hampshire, have first primary)

Similarity expansion

0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(new hampshire, have first primary)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(new hampshire, is primary)
0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(new hampshire, have first primary)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(new hampshire, have primary)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(new hampshire, have first primary)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Salient(new hampshire, have primary)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(new hampshire, have first primary)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(new hampshire, have primary)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(new hampshire, have first primary)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(new hampshire, is primary)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(new hampshire, have first primary)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Salient(new hampshire, is primary)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(new hampshire, have first primary)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(new hampshire, is first primary)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(new hampshire, have first primary)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(new hampshire, is first primary)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(new hampshire, have first primary)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(new hampshire, is primary important)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(new hampshire, have first primary)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(new hampshire, is primary important)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(new hampshire, have first primary)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(new hampshire, have primary)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(new hampshire, have first primary)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(new hampshire, is first primary)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(new hampshire, have first primary)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(new hampshire, is primary important)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(new hampshire, have first primary)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(new hampshire, is first primary)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(new hampshire, have first primary)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(new hampshire, is primary important)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(new hampshire, have first primary)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(new hampshire, is primary)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(new hampshire, have first primary)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(new hampshire, hold first two primary elections)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(new hampshire, have first primary)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(new hampshire, hold first two primary elections)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(new hampshire, have first primary)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(new hampshire, hold two primary elections)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(new hampshire, have first primary)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(new hampshire, hold two primary elections)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(new hampshire, have first primary)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(new hampshire, have considered important primaries)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(new hampshire, have first primary)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(new hampshire, hold first two primary elections)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(new hampshire, have first primary)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(new hampshire, hold two primary elections)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(new hampshire, have first primary)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(new hampshire, have considered important primaries)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(new hampshire, have first primary)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(new hampshire, have considered important primaries)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(new hampshire, have first primary)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(new hampshire, have considered important primaries)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(new hampshire, have first primary)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(new hampshire, hold two primary elections)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(new hampshire, have first primary)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(new hampshire, hold first two primary elections)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(new hampshire, have first primary)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(new hampshire, have first primary)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(new hampshire, have first primary)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(new hampshire, have first primary)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(new hampshire, have first primary)