new hampshire: have considered important primaries

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents new england
Weight: 0.75
, new york
Weight: 0.73
, massachusetts
Weight: 0.64
, maine
Weight: 0.56
Siblings alabama
Weight: 0.65
, manchester
Weight: 0.61
, mississippi
Weight: 0.57
, lake champlain
Weight: 0.56
, new york city
Weight: 0.40

Related properties

Property Similarity
have considered important primaries 1.00
have considered primaries 0.99
be important in primaries 0.98
hold two primary elections 0.84
be important for elections 0.84
hold first two primary elections 0.82
be important in presidential politics 0.82
have primary 0.79
is primary important 0.78
hold two elections 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(new hampshire, have considered important primaries) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(new hampshire, have considered important primaries)

Similarity expansion

0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.56
Typical(new hampshire, have considered important primaries) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(new hampshire, have considered primaries)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(new hampshire, have considered important primaries) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Salient(new hampshire, have considered primaries)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(new hampshire, have considered important primaries) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(new hampshire, have considered primaries)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(new hampshire, have considered important primaries) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(new hampshire, be important in primaries)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(new hampshire, have considered important primaries) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(new hampshire, have considered primaries)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(new hampshire, have considered important primaries) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(new hampshire, be important in primaries)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.56
Typical(new hampshire, have considered important primaries) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(new hampshire, have primary)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(new hampshire, have considered important primaries) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(new hampshire, be important in primaries)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(new hampshire, have considered important primaries) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(new hampshire, be important for elections)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(new hampshire, have considered important primaries) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(new hampshire, hold two primary elections)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(new hampshire, have considered important primaries) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(new hampshire, hold first two primary elections)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.56
Typical(new hampshire, have considered important primaries) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(new hampshire, be important in primaries)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(new hampshire, have considered important primaries) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(new hampshire, be important in presidential politics)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(new hampshire, have considered important primaries) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Salient(new hampshire, have primary)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(new hampshire, have considered important primaries) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(new hampshire, hold two primary elections)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(new hampshire, have considered important primaries) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(new hampshire, have primary)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(new hampshire, have considered important primaries) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(new hampshire, hold two elections)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(new hampshire, have considered important primaries) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(new hampshire, be important for elections)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(new hampshire, have considered important primaries) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(new hampshire, hold first two primary elections)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(new hampshire, have considered important primaries) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(new hampshire, be important in presidential politics)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(new hampshire, have considered important primaries) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(new hampshire, have primary)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(new hampshire, have considered important primaries) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(new hampshire, is primary important)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(new hampshire, have considered important primaries) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(new hampshire, is primary important)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(new hampshire, have considered important primaries) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(new hampshire, hold two elections)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.56
Typical(new hampshire, have considered important primaries) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(new hampshire, is primary important)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(new hampshire, have considered important primaries) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(new hampshire, is primary important)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(new hampshire, have considered important primaries) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(new hampshire, hold two primary elections)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(new hampshire, have considered important primaries) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(new hampshire, be important in presidential politics)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(new hampshire, have considered important primaries) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(new hampshire, hold first two primary elections)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(new hampshire, have considered important primaries) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(new hampshire, be important for elections)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.56
Typical(new hampshire, have considered important primaries) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(new hampshire, hold two primary elections)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(new hampshire, have considered important primaries) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(new hampshire, hold two elections)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.56
Typical(new hampshire, have considered important primaries) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(new hampshire, be important in presidential politics)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.56
Typical(new hampshire, have considered important primaries) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(new hampshire, hold first two primary elections)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.56
Typical(new hampshire, have considered important primaries) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(new hampshire, be important for elections)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.56
Typical(new hampshire, have considered important primaries) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(new hampshire, hold two elections)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(new hampshire, have considered important primaries) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(new hampshire, have considered important primaries) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(new hampshire, have considered important primaries)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(new hampshire, have considered important primaries) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(new hampshire, have considered important primaries)