new hampshire: have considered primaries

Property	Similarity
have considered primaries	1.00
have considered important primaries	0.99
be important in primaries	0.98
hold two primary elections	0.83
be important for elections	0.81
hold first two primary elections	0.81
be important in presidential politics	0.80
hold two elections	0.78
have primary	0.77
hold first two elections	0.76

0.80

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.99

Evidence: 0.94

Remarkable(new hampshire, have considered primaries) ⋁

Evidence: 0.86

¬ Remarkable(new hampshire, have considered important primaries)

0.79

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.98

Evidence: 0.94

Remarkable(new hampshire, have considered primaries) ⋁

Evidence: 0.86

¬ Remarkable(new hampshire, be important in primaries)

0.68

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.94

Remarkable(new hampshire, have considered primaries) ⋁

Evidence: 0.77

¬ Remarkable(new hampshire, hold two primary elections)

0.66

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.94

Remarkable(new hampshire, have considered primaries) ⋁

Evidence: 0.67

¬ Remarkable(new hampshire, hold first two primary elections)

0.66

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.94

Remarkable(new hampshire, have considered primaries) ⋁

Evidence: 0.69

¬ Remarkable(new hampshire, be important for elections)

0.65

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.94

Remarkable(new hampshire, have considered primaries) ⋁

Evidence: 0.71

¬ Remarkable(new hampshire, be important in presidential politics)

0.64

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.94

Remarkable(new hampshire, have considered primaries) ⋁

Evidence: 0.64

¬ Remarkable(new hampshire, hold two elections)

0.63

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.94

Remarkable(new hampshire, have considered primaries) ⋁

Evidence: 0.63

¬ Remarkable(new hampshire, hold first two elections)

0.62

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.94

Remarkable(new hampshire, have considered primaries) ⋁

Evidence: 0.92

¬ Remarkable(new hampshire, have primary)

0.61

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.11

Typical(new hampshire, have considered primaries) ⋁

Evidence: 0.08

¬ Typical(new hampshire, have primary)

0.54

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.99

Evidence: 0.58

Salient(new hampshire, have considered primaries) ⋁

Evidence: 0.85

¬ Salient(new hampshire, have considered important primaries)

0.54

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.98

Evidence: 0.58

Salient(new hampshire, have considered primaries) ⋁

Evidence: 0.84

¬ Salient(new hampshire, be important in primaries)

0.54

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.32

Plausible(new hampshire, have considered primaries) ⋁

Evidence: 0.27

¬ Plausible(new hampshire, have primary)

0.52

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.58

Salient(new hampshire, have considered primaries) ⋁

Evidence: 0.49

¬ Salient(new hampshire, have primary)

0.48

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.99

Evidence: 0.32

Plausible(new hampshire, have considered primaries) ⋁

Evidence: 0.65

¬ Plausible(new hampshire, have considered important primaries)

0.47

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.98

Evidence: 0.32

Plausible(new hampshire, have considered primaries) ⋁

Evidence: 0.64

¬ Plausible(new hampshire, be important in primaries)

0.44

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.58

Salient(new hampshire, have considered primaries) ⋁

Evidence: 0.90

¬ Salient(new hampshire, hold two primary elections)

0.43

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.99

Evidence: 0.11

Typical(new hampshire, have considered primaries) ⋁

Evidence: 0.56

¬ Typical(new hampshire, have considered important primaries)

0.43

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.98

Evidence: 0.11

Typical(new hampshire, have considered primaries) ⋁

Evidence: 0.55

¬ Typical(new hampshire, be important in primaries)

0.41

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.58

Salient(new hampshire, have considered primaries) ⋁

Evidence: 0.96

¬ Salient(new hampshire, hold first two primary elections)

0.41

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.58

Salient(new hampshire, have considered primaries) ⋁

Evidence: 0.94

¬ Salient(new hampshire, be important in presidential politics)

0.41

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.58

Salient(new hampshire, have considered primaries) ⋁

Evidence: 0.92

¬ Salient(new hampshire, hold two elections)

0.41

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.58

Salient(new hampshire, have considered primaries) ⋁

Evidence: 0.99

¬ Salient(new hampshire, be important for elections)

0.38

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.58

Salient(new hampshire, have considered primaries) ⋁

Evidence: 0.97

¬ Salient(new hampshire, hold first two elections)

0.34

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.32

Plausible(new hampshire, have considered primaries) ⋁

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Plausible(new hampshire, hold two primary elections)

0.29

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.32

Plausible(new hampshire, have considered primaries) ⋁

Evidence: 0.85

¬ Plausible(new hampshire, be important in presidential politics)

0.28

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.32

Plausible(new hampshire, have considered primaries) ⋁

Evidence: 0.86

¬ Plausible(new hampshire, hold two elections)

0.27

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.32

Plausible(new hampshire, have considered primaries) ⋁

Evidence: 0.90

¬ Plausible(new hampshire, hold first two primary elections)

0.26

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.32

Plausible(new hampshire, have considered primaries) ⋁

Evidence: 0.94

¬ Plausible(new hampshire, be important for elections)

0.25

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.32

Plausible(new hampshire, have considered primaries) ⋁

Evidence: 0.92

¬ Plausible(new hampshire, hold first two elections)

0.23

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.11

Typical(new hampshire, have considered primaries) ⋁

Evidence: 0.77

¬ Typical(new hampshire, hold two primary elections)

0.15

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.22
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.11

Typical(new hampshire, have considered primaries) ⋁

Evidence: 0.88

¬ Typical(new hampshire, be important in presidential politics)

0.13

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.20
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.11

Typical(new hampshire, have considered primaries) ⋁

Evidence: 0.90

¬ Typical(new hampshire, hold two elections)

0.12

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.17
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.11

Typical(new hampshire, have considered primaries) ⋁

Evidence: 0.94

¬ Typical(new hampshire, hold first two primary elections)

0.10

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.14
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.11

Typical(new hampshire, have considered primaries) ⋁

Evidence: 0.97

¬ Typical(new hampshire, be important for elections)

0.09

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.14
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.11

Typical(new hampshire, have considered primaries) ⋁

Evidence: 0.97

¬ Typical(new hampshire, hold first two elections)

Parents	new england Weight: 0.75 , new york Weight: 0.73 , massachusetts Weight: 0.64 , maine Weight: 0.56
Siblings	alabama Weight: 0.65 , manchester Weight: 0.61 , mississippi Weight: 0.57 , lake champlain Weight: 0.56 , new york city Weight: 0.40

new hampshire: have considered primaries

Related concepts

Related properties

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

Similarity expansion

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

Typical implies Plausible