new hampshire: be important in presidential politics

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents new england
Weight: 0.75
, new york
Weight: 0.73
, massachusetts
Weight: 0.64
, maine
Weight: 0.56
Siblings alabama
Weight: 0.65
, manchester
Weight: 0.61
, mississippi
Weight: 0.57
, lake champlain
Weight: 0.56
, new york city
Weight: 0.40

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important in presidential politics 1.00
be important to presidential campaign trail 0.85
be important for elections 0.83
have considered important primaries 0.82
be important in primaries 0.82
have considered primaries 0.80
hold two primary elections 0.80
hold first two primary elections 0.80
hold first two elections 0.77
hold two elections 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(new hampshire, be important in presidential politics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(new hampshire, be important in presidential politics)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(new hampshire, be important in presidential politics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(new hampshire, be important to presidential campaign trail)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(new hampshire, be important in presidential politics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(new hampshire, have considered primaries)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(new hampshire, be important in presidential politics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(new hampshire, be important for elections)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(new hampshire, be important in presidential politics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(new hampshire, have considered important primaries)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(new hampshire, be important in presidential politics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(new hampshire, be important in primaries)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(new hampshire, be important in presidential politics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Salient(new hampshire, have considered primaries)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(new hampshire, be important in presidential politics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(new hampshire, have considered important primaries)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(new hampshire, be important in presidential politics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(new hampshire, be important in primaries)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(new hampshire, be important in presidential politics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(new hampshire, have considered primaries)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(new hampshire, be important in presidential politics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(new hampshire, be important to presidential campaign trail)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(new hampshire, be important in presidential politics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(new hampshire, hold two primary elections)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(new hampshire, be important in presidential politics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(new hampshire, hold first two primary elections)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(new hampshire, be important in presidential politics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(new hampshire, have considered important primaries)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(new hampshire, be important in presidential politics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(new hampshire, be important in primaries)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(new hampshire, be important in presidential politics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(new hampshire, be important to presidential campaign trail)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(new hampshire, be important in presidential politics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(new hampshire, be important for elections)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(new hampshire, be important in presidential politics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(new hampshire, hold two elections)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(new hampshire, be important in presidential politics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(new hampshire, hold first two elections)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(new hampshire, be important in presidential politics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(new hampshire, hold two primary elections)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(new hampshire, be important in presidential politics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(new hampshire, be important for elections)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(new hampshire, be important in presidential politics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(new hampshire, hold two primary elections)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(new hampshire, be important in presidential politics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(new hampshire, hold first two primary elections)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(new hampshire, be important in presidential politics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(new hampshire, hold first two primary elections)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(new hampshire, be important in presidential politics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(new hampshire, hold two elections)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(new hampshire, be important in presidential politics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(new hampshire, hold first two elections)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(new hampshire, be important in presidential politics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(new hampshire, hold two elections)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(new hampshire, be important in presidential politics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(new hampshire, hold first two elections)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(new hampshire, be important in presidential politics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(new hampshire, be important to presidential campaign trail)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(new hampshire, be important in presidential politics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(new hampshire, be important for elections)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(new hampshire, be important in presidential politics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(new hampshire, hold first two primary elections)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(new hampshire, be important in presidential politics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(new hampshire, hold first two elections)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(new hampshire, be important in presidential politics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(new hampshire, hold two elections)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(new hampshire, be important in presidential politics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(new hampshire, hold two primary elections)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(new hampshire, be important in presidential politics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(new hampshire, have considered important primaries)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(new hampshire, be important in presidential politics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(new hampshire, be important in primaries)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(new hampshire, be important in presidential politics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(new hampshire, have considered primaries)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(new hampshire, be important in presidential politics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(new hampshire, be important in presidential politics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(new hampshire, be important in presidential politics)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(new hampshire, be important in presidential politics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(new hampshire, be important in presidential politics)