new hampshire: be important to presidential campaign trail

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents new england
Weight: 0.75
, new york
Weight: 0.73
, massachusetts
Weight: 0.64
, maine
Weight: 0.56
Siblings alabama
Weight: 0.65
, manchester
Weight: 0.61
, mississippi
Weight: 0.57
, lake champlain
Weight: 0.56
, new york city
Weight: 0.40

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important to presidential campaign trail 1.00
be important in presidential politics 0.85
be important in primaries 0.78
have considered important primaries 0.78
have considered primaries 0.76
be important for elections 0.76
hold first two primary elections 0.75
hold two primary elections 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(new hampshire, be important to presidential campaign trail)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(new hampshire, be important to presidential campaign trail)

Similarity expansion

0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(new hampshire, be important to presidential campaign trail)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(new hampshire, be important in presidential politics)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(new hampshire, be important to presidential campaign trail)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(new hampshire, be important in presidential politics)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(new hampshire, be important to presidential campaign trail)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(new hampshire, be important in presidential politics)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(new hampshire, be important to presidential campaign trail)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(new hampshire, be important in primaries)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(new hampshire, be important to presidential campaign trail)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(new hampshire, have considered important primaries)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(new hampshire, be important to presidential campaign trail)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(new hampshire, have considered primaries)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(new hampshire, be important to presidential campaign trail)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Salient(new hampshire, have considered primaries)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(new hampshire, be important to presidential campaign trail)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(new hampshire, have considered primaries)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(new hampshire, be important to presidential campaign trail)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(new hampshire, be important in primaries)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(new hampshire, be important to presidential campaign trail)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(new hampshire, have considered important primaries)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(new hampshire, be important to presidential campaign trail)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(new hampshire, be important for elections)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(new hampshire, be important to presidential campaign trail)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(new hampshire, hold two primary elections)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(new hampshire, be important to presidential campaign trail)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(new hampshire, hold first two primary elections)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(new hampshire, be important to presidential campaign trail)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(new hampshire, be important in primaries)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(new hampshire, be important to presidential campaign trail)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(new hampshire, have considered important primaries)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(new hampshire, be important to presidential campaign trail)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(new hampshire, be important in presidential politics)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(new hampshire, be important to presidential campaign trail)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(new hampshire, hold two primary elections)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(new hampshire, be important to presidential campaign trail)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(new hampshire, hold two primary elections)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(new hampshire, be important to presidential campaign trail)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(new hampshire, be important for elections)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(new hampshire, be important to presidential campaign trail)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(new hampshire, hold first two primary elections)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(new hampshire, be important to presidential campaign trail)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(new hampshire, hold first two primary elections)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(new hampshire, be important to presidential campaign trail)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(new hampshire, be important for elections)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(new hampshire, be important to presidential campaign trail)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(new hampshire, hold first two primary elections)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(new hampshire, be important to presidential campaign trail)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(new hampshire, be important for elections)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(new hampshire, be important to presidential campaign trail)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(new hampshire, be important in primaries)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(new hampshire, be important to presidential campaign trail)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(new hampshire, have considered important primaries)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(new hampshire, be important to presidential campaign trail)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(new hampshire, hold two primary elections)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(new hampshire, be important to presidential campaign trail)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(new hampshire, have considered primaries)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(new hampshire, be important to presidential campaign trail)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(new hampshire, be important to presidential campaign trail)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(new hampshire, be important to presidential campaign trail)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(new hampshire, be important to presidential campaign trail)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(new hampshire, be important to presidential campaign trail)