new hampshire: were excluded

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents new england
Weight: 0.75
, new york
Weight: 0.73
, massachusetts
Weight: 0.64
, maine
Weight: 0.56
Siblings alabama
Weight: 0.65
, manchester
Weight: 0.61
, mississippi
Weight: 0.57
, lake champlain
Weight: 0.56
, new york city
Weight: 0.40

Related properties

Property Similarity
were excluded 1.00
were excluded from england confederation 0.81
were excluded from england confederation of 1643 0.81
were excluded from new england confederation of 1643 0.80
were excluded from new england confederation 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(new hampshire, were excluded) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Salient(new hampshire, were excluded)

Similarity expansion

0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(new hampshire, were excluded) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(new hampshire, were excluded from england confederation of 1643)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(new hampshire, were excluded) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(new hampshire, were excluded from england confederation)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.04
Salient(new hampshire, were excluded) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Salient(new hampshire, were excluded from england confederation of 1643)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.05
Remarkable(new hampshire, were excluded) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(new hampshire, were excluded from england confederation of 1643)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.04
Salient(new hampshire, were excluded) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Salient(new hampshire, were excluded from england confederation)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.20
Typical(new hampshire, were excluded) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(new hampshire, were excluded from england confederation)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.05
Remarkable(new hampshire, were excluded) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(new hampshire, were excluded from england confederation)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.20
Typical(new hampshire, were excluded) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(new hampshire, were excluded from england confederation of 1643)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.20
Typical(new hampshire, were excluded) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(new hampshire, were excluded from new england confederation)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(new hampshire, were excluded) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(new hampshire, were excluded from new england confederation)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.05
Remarkable(new hampshire, were excluded) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(new hampshire, were excluded from new england confederation of 1643)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.20
Typical(new hampshire, were excluded) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(new hampshire, were excluded from new england confederation of 1643)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(new hampshire, were excluded) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(new hampshire, were excluded from new england confederation of 1643)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.04
Salient(new hampshire, were excluded) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(new hampshire, were excluded from new england confederation)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.04
Salient(new hampshire, were excluded) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(new hampshire, were excluded from new england confederation of 1643)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.05
Remarkable(new hampshire, were excluded) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(new hampshire, were excluded from new england confederation)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.04
Salient(new hampshire, were excluded) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(new hampshire, were excluded) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(new hampshire, were excluded)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(new hampshire, were excluded) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(new hampshire, were excluded)