new hampshire: were excluded from england confederation of 1643

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents new england
Weight: 0.75
, new york
Weight: 0.73
, massachusetts
Weight: 0.64
, maine
Weight: 0.56
Siblings alabama
Weight: 0.65
, manchester
Weight: 0.61
, mississippi
Weight: 0.57
, lake champlain
Weight: 0.56
, new york city
Weight: 0.40

Related properties

Property Similarity
were excluded from england confederation 1.00
were excluded from england confederation of 1643 1.00
were excluded from new england confederation of 1643 0.99
were excluded from new england confederation 0.99
were excluded 0.81
be called england 0.78
be called new england 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(maine, be called new england) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(new hampshire, were excluded from england confederation of 1643)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(maine, be called england) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(new hampshire, were excluded from england confederation of 1643)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(massachusetts, be called new england) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(new hampshire, were excluded from england confederation of 1643)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(new england, be called new england) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(new hampshire, were excluded from england confederation of 1643)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(new england, be called england) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(new hampshire, were excluded from england confederation of 1643)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(massachusetts, be called england) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(new hampshire, were excluded from england confederation of 1643)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(new hampshire, were excluded from england confederation of 1643) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(massachusetts, be called england)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(new hampshire, were excluded from england confederation of 1643) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(new england, be called england)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(new hampshire, were excluded from england confederation of 1643) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(new england, be called new england)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(new hampshire, were excluded from england confederation of 1643) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(massachusetts, be called new england)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(new hampshire, were excluded from england confederation of 1643) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(maine, be called england)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(new hampshire, were excluded from england confederation of 1643) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(maine, be called new england)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(new hampshire, were excluded from england confederation of 1643) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(massachusetts, be called england)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(new hampshire, were excluded from england confederation of 1643) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(new england, be called england)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(new hampshire, were excluded from england confederation of 1643) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(maine, be called new england)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(new hampshire, were excluded from england confederation of 1643) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(massachusetts, be called new england)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(new hampshire, were excluded from england confederation of 1643) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(maine, be called england)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(new hampshire, were excluded from england confederation of 1643) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(new england, be called new england)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(maine, be called new england) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
Remarkable(new hampshire, were excluded from england confederation of 1643) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(new hampshire, were excluded from england confederation of 1643)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(maine, be called england) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
Remarkable(new hampshire, were excluded from england confederation of 1643) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(new hampshire, were excluded from england confederation of 1643)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(massachusetts, be called new england) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
Remarkable(new hampshire, were excluded from england confederation of 1643) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(new hampshire, were excluded from england confederation of 1643)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(new england, be called england) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
Remarkable(new hampshire, were excluded from england confederation of 1643) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(new hampshire, were excluded from england confederation of 1643)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(massachusetts, be called england) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
Remarkable(new hampshire, were excluded from england confederation of 1643) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(new hampshire, were excluded from england confederation of 1643)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(new england, be called new england) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
Remarkable(new hampshire, were excluded from england confederation of 1643) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(new hampshire, were excluded from england confederation of 1643)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(new hampshire, were excluded from england confederation of 1643) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Salient(new hampshire, were excluded from england confederation of 1643)

Similarity expansion

0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(new hampshire, were excluded from england confederation of 1643) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(new hampshire, were excluded from england confederation)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
Salient(new hampshire, were excluded from england confederation of 1643) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Salient(new hampshire, were excluded from england confederation)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
Typical(new hampshire, were excluded from england confederation of 1643) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(new hampshire, were excluded from england confederation)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.16
Remarkable(new hampshire, were excluded from england confederation of 1643) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(new hampshire, were excluded from england confederation)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(new hampshire, were excluded from england confederation of 1643) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(new hampshire, were excluded)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.13
Salient(new hampshire, were excluded from england confederation of 1643) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Salient(new hampshire, were excluded)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.16
Remarkable(new hampshire, were excluded from england confederation of 1643) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(new hampshire, were excluded)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.30
Typical(new hampshire, were excluded from england confederation of 1643) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(new hampshire, be called new england)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.30
Typical(new hampshire, were excluded from england confederation of 1643) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(new hampshire, be called england)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.30
Typical(new hampshire, were excluded from england confederation of 1643) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(new hampshire, were excluded)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(new hampshire, were excluded from england confederation of 1643) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(new hampshire, be called england)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.30
Typical(new hampshire, were excluded from england confederation of 1643) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(new hampshire, were excluded from new england confederation)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(new hampshire, were excluded from england confederation of 1643) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(new hampshire, be called new england)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.13
Salient(new hampshire, were excluded from england confederation of 1643) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Salient(new hampshire, be called england)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.16
Remarkable(new hampshire, were excluded from england confederation of 1643) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(new hampshire, were excluded from new england confederation of 1643)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(new hampshire, were excluded from england confederation of 1643) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(new hampshire, were excluded from new england confederation)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.30
Typical(new hampshire, were excluded from england confederation of 1643) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(new hampshire, were excluded from new england confederation of 1643)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.13
Salient(new hampshire, were excluded from england confederation of 1643) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Salient(new hampshire, be called new england)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(new hampshire, were excluded from england confederation of 1643) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(new hampshire, were excluded from new england confederation of 1643)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.13
Salient(new hampshire, were excluded from england confederation of 1643) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(new hampshire, were excluded from new england confederation)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.13
Salient(new hampshire, were excluded from england confederation of 1643) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(new hampshire, were excluded from new england confederation of 1643)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.16
Remarkable(new hampshire, were excluded from england confederation of 1643) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(new hampshire, were excluded from new england confederation)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.16
Remarkable(new hampshire, were excluded from england confederation of 1643) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(new hampshire, be called england)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.16
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.16
Remarkable(new hampshire, were excluded from england confederation of 1643) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(new hampshire, be called new england)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
Salient(new hampshire, were excluded from england confederation of 1643) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(new hampshire, were excluded from england confederation of 1643) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(new hampshire, were excluded from england confederation of 1643)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(new hampshire, were excluded from england confederation of 1643) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(new hampshire, were excluded from england confederation of 1643)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(new hampshire, were excluded from england confederation of 1643) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(new england, be called england)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(new hampshire, were excluded from england confederation of 1643) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(massachusetts, be called england)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(new hampshire, were excluded from england confederation of 1643) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(new england, be called new england)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(new hampshire, were excluded from england confederation of 1643) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(maine, be called england)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(new hampshire, were excluded from england confederation of 1643) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(massachusetts, be called new england)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(new hampshire, were excluded from england confederation of 1643) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(maine, be called new england)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.30
Typical(new hampshire, were excluded from england confederation of 1643) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(new england, be called new england)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.30
Typical(new hampshire, were excluded from england confederation of 1643) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(new england, be called england)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.30
Typical(new hampshire, were excluded from england confederation of 1643) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(massachusetts, be called england)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.30
Typical(new hampshire, were excluded from england confederation of 1643) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(maine, be called england)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.30
Typical(new hampshire, were excluded from england confederation of 1643) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(massachusetts, be called new england)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.30
Typical(new hampshire, were excluded from england confederation of 1643) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(maine, be called new england)