new hampshire: were settled

Related concepts

Parents	new england Weight: 0.75 , new york Weight: 0.73 , massachusetts Weight: 0.64 , maine Weight: 0.56
Siblings	alabama Weight: 0.65 , manchester Weight: 0.61 , mississippi Weight: 0.57 , lake champlain Weight: 0.56 , new york city Weight: 0.40

Related properties

Property	Similarity
were settled	1.00
was settled	0.98
was first settled in colonies	0.86

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.63

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.98

Evidence: 0.60

Plausible(maine, was settled) ⋁

Evidence: 0.06

¬ Typical(new hampshire, were settled)

0.63

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.98

Evidence: 0.36

Plausible(massachusetts, was settled) ⋁

Evidence: 0.06

¬ Typical(new hampshire, were settled)

0.62

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.98

Evidence: 0.29

Plausible(new york, was settled) ⋁

Evidence: 0.06

¬ Typical(new hampshire, were settled)

0.62

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.98

Evidence: 0.27

Plausible(new england, was settled) ⋁

Evidence: 0.06

¬ Typical(new hampshire, were settled)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.98

Evidence: 0.23

Plausible(new hampshire, were settled) ⋁

Evidence: 0.27

¬ Plausible(new england, was settled)

0.07

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.98

Evidence: 0.23

Plausible(new hampshire, were settled) ⋁

Evidence: 0.29

¬ Plausible(new york, was settled)

0.07

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.98

Evidence: 0.23

Plausible(new hampshire, were settled) ⋁

Evidence: 0.36

¬ Plausible(massachusetts, was settled)

0.05

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.98

Evidence: 0.23

Plausible(new hampshire, were settled) ⋁

Evidence: 0.60

¬ Plausible(maine, was settled)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.23

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.98

Evidence: 0.92

¬ Remarkable(new hampshire, were settled) ⋁

Evidence: 0.65

¬ Remarkable(maine, was settled)

0.13

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.23
Similarity weight: 0.98

Evidence: 0.92

¬ Remarkable(new hampshire, were settled) ⋁

Evidence: 0.84

¬ Remarkable(massachusetts, was settled)

0.08

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.15
Similarity weight: 0.98

Evidence: 0.92

¬ Remarkable(new hampshire, were settled) ⋁

Evidence: 0.92

¬ Remarkable(new england, was settled)

0.05

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.09
Similarity weight: 0.98

Evidence: 0.92

¬ Remarkable(new hampshire, were settled) ⋁

Evidence: 0.99

¬ Remarkable(new york, was settled)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.98

Evidence: 0.60

Plausible(maine, was settled) ⋁

Evidence: 0.92

Remarkable(new hampshire, were settled) ⋁

Evidence: 0.23

¬ Plausible(new hampshire, were settled)

0.41

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.98

Evidence: 0.36

Plausible(massachusetts, was settled) ⋁

Evidence: 0.92

Remarkable(new hampshire, were settled) ⋁

Evidence: 0.23

¬ Plausible(new hampshire, were settled)

0.41

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.98

Evidence: 0.29

Plausible(new york, was settled) ⋁

Evidence: 0.92

Remarkable(new hampshire, were settled) ⋁

Evidence: 0.23

¬ Plausible(new hampshire, were settled)

0.41

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.98

Evidence: 0.27

Plausible(new england, was settled) ⋁

Evidence: 0.92

Remarkable(new hampshire, were settled) ⋁

Evidence: 0.23

¬ Plausible(new hampshire, were settled)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.23

Plausible(new hampshire, were settled) ⋁

Evidence: 0.45

¬ Salient(new hampshire, were settled)

Similarity expansion

0.80

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.98

Evidence: 0.06

Typical(new hampshire, were settled) ⋁

Evidence: 0.05

¬ Typical(new hampshire, was settled)

0.78

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.98

Evidence: 0.92

Remarkable(new hampshire, were settled) ⋁

Evidence: 0.94

¬ Remarkable(new hampshire, was settled)

0.70

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.06

Typical(new hampshire, were settled) ⋁

Evidence: 0.04

¬ Typical(new hampshire, was first settled in colonies)

0.70

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.98

Evidence: 0.23

Plausible(new hampshire, were settled) ⋁

Evidence: 0.22

¬ Plausible(new hampshire, was settled)

0.68

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.92

Remarkable(new hampshire, were settled) ⋁

Evidence: 0.98

¬ Remarkable(new hampshire, was first settled in colonies)

0.63

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.98

Evidence: 0.45

Salient(new hampshire, were settled) ⋁

Evidence: 0.46

¬ Salient(new hampshire, was settled)

0.59

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.23

Plausible(new hampshire, were settled) ⋁

Evidence: 0.25

¬ Plausible(new hampshire, was first settled in colonies)

0.51

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.45

Salient(new hampshire, were settled) ⋁

Evidence: 0.56

¬ Salient(new hampshire, was first settled in colonies)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.45

Salient(new hampshire, were settled) ⋁

Evidence: 0.06

¬ Typical(new hampshire, were settled) ⋁

Evidence: 0.92

¬ Remarkable(new hampshire, were settled)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.23

Plausible(new hampshire, were settled) ⋁

Evidence: 0.06

¬ Typical(new hampshire, were settled)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.47

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.98

Evidence: 0.92

¬ Remarkable(new hampshire, were settled) ⋁

Evidence: 0.06

¬ Typical(new york, was settled)

0.47

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.98

Evidence: 0.92

¬ Remarkable(new hampshire, were settled) ⋁

Evidence: 0.07

¬ Typical(new england, was settled)

0.39

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.98

Evidence: 0.92

¬ Remarkable(new hampshire, were settled) ⋁

Evidence: 0.24

¬ Typical(massachusetts, was settled)

0.21

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.98

Evidence: 0.92

¬ Remarkable(new hampshire, were settled) ⋁

Evidence: 0.62

¬ Typical(maine, was settled)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.45

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.98

Evidence: 0.06

Typical(new hampshire, were settled) ⋁

Evidence: 0.06

¬ Typical(new york, was settled)

0.44

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.98

Evidence: 0.06

Typical(new hampshire, were settled) ⋁

Evidence: 0.07

¬ Typical(new england, was settled)

0.37

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.98

Evidence: 0.06

Typical(new hampshire, were settled) ⋁

Evidence: 0.24

¬ Typical(massachusetts, was settled)

0.20

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.98

Evidence: 0.06

Typical(new hampshire, were settled) ⋁

Evidence: 0.62

¬ Typical(maine, was settled)