new jersey: has quality service

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents team
Weight: 0.71
, new york city
Weight: 0.67
, new york
Weight: 0.67
, new england
Weight: 0.66
Siblings bergen
Weight: 0.46
, football team
Weight: 0.36
, basketball team
Weight: 0.35
, baseball team
Weight: 0.34
, new hampshire
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality service 1.00
is full service 0.87
have full service gas 0.82
is service gas 0.82
is full service gas 0.82
has quality good 0.81

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(new jersey, has quality service)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(basketball team, has quality good)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(new jersey, has quality service)
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(basketball team, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(basketball team, has quality good)

Salient implies Plausible

0.16
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(new jersey, has quality service)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(new jersey, has quality service)

Similarity expansion

0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(new jersey, has quality service)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(new jersey, is full service)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(new jersey, has quality service)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(new jersey, is service gas)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(new jersey, has quality service)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(new jersey, is full service gas)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(new jersey, has quality service)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(new jersey, have full service gas)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(new jersey, has quality service)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(new jersey, has quality good)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(new jersey, has quality service)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Salient(new jersey, is service gas)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(new jersey, has quality service)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Salient(new jersey, is full service gas)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(new jersey, has quality service)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Salient(new jersey, have full service gas)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.15
Typical(new jersey, has quality service)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(new jersey, is service gas)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(new jersey, has quality service)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(new jersey, is full service)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(new jersey, has quality service)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(new jersey, is full service gas)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(new jersey, has quality service)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(new jersey, has quality good)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(new jersey, has quality service)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(new jersey, have full service gas)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(new jersey, has quality service)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(new jersey, is service gas)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(new jersey, has quality service)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(new jersey, has quality good)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(new jersey, has quality service)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(new jersey, is full service)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.15
Typical(new jersey, has quality service)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(new jersey, has quality good)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.15
Typical(new jersey, has quality service)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(new jersey, have full service gas)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.15
Typical(new jersey, has quality service)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(new jersey, is full service gas)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.15
Typical(new jersey, has quality service)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(new jersey, is full service)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(new jersey, has quality service)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(new jersey, has quality service)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(new jersey, has quality service)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(new jersey, has quality service)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(new jersey, has quality service)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.02
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.17
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(new jersey, has quality service)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(basketball team, has quality good)