new jersey: has quality good

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents team
Weight: 0.71
, new york city
Weight: 0.67
, new york
Weight: 0.67
, new england
Weight: 0.66
Siblings bergen
Weight: 0.46
, football team
Weight: 0.36
, basketball team
Weight: 0.35
, baseball team
Weight: 0.34
, new hampshire
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality good 1.00
is great 0.81
has quality service 0.81
have bad reputation 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(new york, is great)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(new jersey, has quality good)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(new jersey, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(new york, is great)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.12
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(new jersey, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(new york, is great)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(new jersey, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(basketball team, has quality good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(new york, is great)
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(new jersey, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(new jersey, has quality good)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(new jersey, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(basketball team, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(basketball team, has quality good)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(new jersey, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(new jersey, has quality good)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(new jersey, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Salient(new jersey, have bad reputation)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(new jersey, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(new jersey, have bad reputation)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(new jersey, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(new jersey, has quality service)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(new jersey, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(new jersey, have bad reputation)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(new jersey, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(new jersey, has quality service)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(new jersey, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(new jersey, is great)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(new jersey, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(new jersey, is great)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(new jersey, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(new jersey, has quality service)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(new jersey, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(new jersey, has quality service)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(new jersey, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(new jersey, have bad reputation)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(new jersey, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(new jersey, is great)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(new jersey, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(new jersey, is great)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(new jersey, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(new jersey, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(new jersey, has quality good)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(new jersey, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(new jersey, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.13
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(new jersey, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(new york, is great)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(new jersey, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(basketball team, has quality good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.27
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(new jersey, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(new york, is great)