new jersey: have bad reputation

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents team
Weight: 0.71
, new york city
Weight: 0.67
, new york
Weight: 0.67
, new england
Weight: 0.66
Siblings bergen
Weight: 0.46
, football team
Weight: 0.36
, basketball team
Weight: 0.35
, baseball team
Weight: 0.34
, new hampshire
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
have bad reputation 1.00
has quality good 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(new jersey, have bad reputation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(basketball team, has quality good)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.37
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(new jersey, have bad reputation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(basketball team, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(basketball team, has quality good)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(new jersey, have bad reputation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Salient(new jersey, have bad reputation)

Similarity expansion

0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.28
Typical(new jersey, have bad reputation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(new jersey, has quality good)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(new jersey, have bad reputation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(new jersey, has quality good)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.20
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.08
Remarkable(new jersey, have bad reputation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(new jersey, has quality good)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.18
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.07
Salient(new jersey, have bad reputation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(new jersey, has quality good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
Salient(new jersey, have bad reputation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(new jersey, have bad reputation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(new jersey, have bad reputation)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(new jersey, have bad reputation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(new jersey, have bad reputation)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(new jersey, have bad reputation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(basketball team, has quality good)