new orleans: is best city

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents new england
Weight: 0.68
, hurricane
Weight: 0.68
, texas
Weight: 0.67
, memphis
Weight: 0.67
Siblings mardi gras
Weight: 0.66
, washington
Weight: 0.62
, minnesota
Weight: 0.57
, gumbo
Weight: 0.56

Related properties

Property Similarity
is best city 1.00
is city 0.88
is important city 0.87
be called city 0.84
be known as city 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.37
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(memphis, is city)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(new orleans, is best city)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(new orleans, is best city)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(memphis, is city)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.13
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(new orleans, is best city)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(memphis, is city)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(new orleans, is best city)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(minnesota, be called city)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(new orleans, is best city)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(washington, be called city)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(memphis, is city)
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(new orleans, is best city)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(new orleans, is best city)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(new orleans, is best city)
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(washington, be called city)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(washington, be called city)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(new orleans, is best city)
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(minnesota, be called city)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(minnesota, be called city)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(new orleans, is best city)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(new orleans, is best city)

Similarity expansion

0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(new orleans, is best city)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(new orleans, is city)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(new orleans, is best city)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Salient(new orleans, is city)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(new orleans, is best city)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Salient(new orleans, be called city)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(new orleans, is best city)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(new orleans, be called city)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(new orleans, is best city)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(new orleans, be called city)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(new orleans, is best city)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(new orleans, is city)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(new orleans, is best city)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(new orleans, be called city)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(new orleans, is best city)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(new orleans, be known as city)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(new orleans, is best city)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(new orleans, is important city)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(new orleans, is best city)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(new orleans, is important city)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(new orleans, is best city)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(new orleans, is city)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(new orleans, is best city)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Salient(new orleans, be known as city)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(new orleans, is best city)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(new orleans, be known as city)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(new orleans, is best city)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(new orleans, is important city)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(new orleans, is best city)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(new orleans, be known as city)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(new orleans, is best city)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(new orleans, is important city)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(new orleans, is best city)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(new orleans, is best city)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(new orleans, is best city)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(new orleans, is best city)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(new orleans, is best city)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(new orleans, is best city)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(memphis, is city)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(new orleans, is best city)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(washington, be called city)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(new orleans, is best city)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(minnesota, be called city)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(new orleans, is best city)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(memphis, is city)