new orleans: was affected badly by hurricane katrina

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents new england
Weight: 0.68
, hurricane
Weight: 0.68
, texas
Weight: 0.67
, memphis
Weight: 0.67
Siblings mardi gras
Weight: 0.66
, washington
Weight: 0.62
, minnesota
Weight: 0.57
, gumbo
Weight: 0.56

Related properties

Property Similarity
was affected badly by hurricane katrina 1.00
be weak to hurricanes 0.82
be prone to hurricanes 0.80
be susceptible to hurricanes 0.78
was vulnerable to flooding 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(new orleans, was affected badly by hurricane katrina) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Salient(new orleans, was affected badly by hurricane katrina)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(new orleans, was affected badly by hurricane katrina) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(new orleans, be weak to hurricanes)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.21
Salient(new orleans, was affected badly by hurricane katrina) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Salient(new orleans, be weak to hurricanes)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(new orleans, was affected badly by hurricane katrina) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(new orleans, be weak to hurricanes)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.55
Typical(new orleans, was affected badly by hurricane katrina) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(new orleans, be weak to hurricanes)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(new orleans, was affected badly by hurricane katrina) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(new orleans, be prone to hurricanes)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.21
Salient(new orleans, was affected badly by hurricane katrina) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Salient(new orleans, be prone to hurricanes)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(new orleans, was affected badly by hurricane katrina) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(new orleans, be susceptible to hurricanes)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.21
Salient(new orleans, was affected badly by hurricane katrina) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Salient(new orleans, be susceptible to hurricanes)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.55
Typical(new orleans, was affected badly by hurricane katrina) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(new orleans, be susceptible to hurricanes)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.55
Typical(new orleans, was affected badly by hurricane katrina) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(new orleans, be prone to hurricanes)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(new orleans, was affected badly by hurricane katrina) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(new orleans, be prone to hurricanes)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.55
Typical(new orleans, was affected badly by hurricane katrina) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(new orleans, was vulnerable to flooding)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(new orleans, was affected badly by hurricane katrina) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(new orleans, be susceptible to hurricanes)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(new orleans, was affected badly by hurricane katrina) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(new orleans, was vulnerable to flooding)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.21
Salient(new orleans, was affected badly by hurricane katrina) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Salient(new orleans, was vulnerable to flooding)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(new orleans, was affected badly by hurricane katrina) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(new orleans, was vulnerable to flooding)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
Salient(new orleans, was affected badly by hurricane katrina) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(new orleans, was affected badly by hurricane katrina) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(new orleans, was affected badly by hurricane katrina)

Typical implies Plausible

0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(new orleans, was affected badly by hurricane katrina) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(new orleans, was affected badly by hurricane katrina)