new york city: is best

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents new york
Weight: 0.90
, town
Weight: 0.73
, new england
Weight: 0.73
, city
Weight: 0.72
Siblings brooklyn bridge
Weight: 0.72
, empire state building
Weight: 0.69
, ellis island
Weight: 0.69
, albany
Weight: 0.68
, african american
Weight: 0.68

Related properties

Property Similarity
is best 1.00
be best place live 0.84

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.36
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(new england, be best place live)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(new york city, is best)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(new york city, is best)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(new england, be best place live)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.17
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(new york city, is best)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(new england, be best place live)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(new england, be best place live)
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(new york city, is best)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(new york city, is best)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(new york city, is best)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(new york city, is best)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(new york city, is best)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(new york city, be best place live)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(new york city, is best)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(new york city, be best place live)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(new york city, is best)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(new york city, be best place live)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(new york city, is best)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(new york city, be best place live)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(new york city, is best)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(new york city, is best)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(new york city, is best)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(new york city, is best)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(new york city, is best)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.27
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(new york city, is best)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(new england, be best place live)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(new york city, is best)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(new england, be best place live)