news: be when bad

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents television show
Weight: 0.67
, message
Weight: 0.62
, statement
Weight: 0.61
, word
Weight: 0.61
Siblings reuters
Weight: 0.63
, release
Weight: 0.60
, return
Weight: 0.57
, verdict
Weight: 0.49
, press
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be when bad 1.00
has quality bad 0.81
be considered bad 0.81
is terrible 0.80
become bad 0.80
come out wrong 0.79
good 0.78
report bad things 0.78
is bad words 0.77
be pretty much thing on news 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(word, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(news, be when bad)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(word, is bad words)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(news, be when bad)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(word, be considered bad)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(news, be when bad)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(news, be when bad)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(word, be considered bad)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(news, be when bad)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(word, has quality bad)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(news, be when bad)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(word, is bad words)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(news, be when bad)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(word, be considered bad)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(news, be when bad)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(word, has quality bad)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(news, be when bad)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(word, is bad words)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(news, be when bad)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(press, has quality bad)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(news, be when bad)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(return, is terrible)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(word, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(news, be when bad)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(news, be when bad)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(word, is bad words)
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(news, be when bad)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(news, be when bad)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(word, be considered bad)
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(news, be when bad)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(news, be when bad)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(news, be when bad)
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(press, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(press, has quality bad)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(news, be when bad)
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(return, is terrible)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(return, is terrible)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(news, be when bad)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Salient(news, be when bad)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(news, be when bad)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(news, be pretty much thing on news)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(news, be when bad)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(news, be pretty much thing on news)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(news, be when bad)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(news, report bad things)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(news, be when bad)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(news, has quality bad)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(news, be when bad)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Salient(news, be pretty much thing on news)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(news, be when bad)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(news, report bad things)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(news, be when bad)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(news, has quality bad)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(news, be when bad)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(news, has quality bad)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(news, be when bad)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(news, report bad things)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(news, be when bad)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(news, has quality bad)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(news, be when bad)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(news, report bad things)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(news, be when bad)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(news, be pretty much thing on news)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(news, be when bad)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(news, be when bad)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(news, be when bad)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(news, be when bad)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(news, be when bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(news, be when bad)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(word, be considered bad)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(news, be when bad)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(word, is bad words)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(news, be when bad)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(word, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(news, be when bad)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(press, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(news, be when bad)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(return, is terrible)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(news, be when bad)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(word, be considered bad)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(news, be when bad)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(word, has quality bad)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(news, be when bad)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(word, is bad words)