press: has quality bad

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents statement
Weight: 0.65
, document
Weight: 0.59
, liberty
Weight: 0.59
, topic
Weight: 0.58
, report
Weight: 0.58
Siblings news
Weight: 0.34
, bank statement
Weight: 0.34
, public speaking
Weight: 0.33
, speech
Weight: 0.33
, remark
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality bad 1.00
has quality good 0.96
has quality better 0.90
has quality right 0.88
is quality 0.87
quality 0.86
has quality worth 0.82
be when bad 0.81
has quality class 0.80
has quality function 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(press, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(speech, has quality bad)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(press, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(news, has quality bad)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(press, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(speech, has quality good)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(press, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(news, has quality good)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(press, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(news, be when bad)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(press, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(speech, has quality class)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(press, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(news, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(news, has quality good)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(press, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(speech, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(speech, has quality good)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(press, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(news, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(news, has quality bad)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(press, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(speech, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(speech, has quality bad)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(press, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(speech, has quality class) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(speech, has quality class)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(press, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(news, be when bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(news, be when bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(press, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Salient(press, has quality bad)

Similarity expansion

0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(press, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(press, quality)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(press, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(press, has quality good)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(press, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(press, is quality)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(press, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(press, has quality better)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(press, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(press, quality)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(press, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(press, is quality)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(press, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(press, has quality good)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(press, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(press, has quality better)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.25
Salient(press, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Salient(press, quality)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.25
Salient(press, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(press, is quality)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.25
Salient(press, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(press, has quality good)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.25
Salient(press, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(press, has quality better)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(press, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(press, has quality better)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(press, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(press, has quality good)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(press, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(press, is quality)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(press, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(press, quality)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
Salient(press, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(press, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(press, has quality bad)

Typical implies Plausible

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(press, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(press, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(press, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(speech, has quality bad)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(press, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(news, has quality bad)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(press, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(news, has quality good)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(press, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(speech, has quality good)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(press, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(news, be when bad)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(press, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(speech, has quality class)