niche: be important to community structure

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents thing
Weight: 0.58
, feature
Weight: 0.56
, place
Weight: 0.55
, area
Weight: 0.50
Siblings product
Weight: 0.62
, shemale
Weight: 0.47
, groove
Weight: 0.31
, void
Weight: 0.31
, specialization
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important to community structure 1.00
maintain community 0.82
maintain healthy community 0.79
be important in business 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(niche, be important to community structure)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(specialization, be important in business)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(niche, be important to community structure)
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(specialization, be important in business)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(specialization, be important in business)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(niche, be important to community structure)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(niche, be important to community structure)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(niche, be important to community structure)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Salient(niche, maintain healthy community)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(niche, be important to community structure)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(niche, maintain healthy community)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(niche, be important to community structure)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(niche, maintain healthy community)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(niche, be important to community structure)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(niche, maintain community)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(niche, be important to community structure)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(niche, maintain healthy community)
...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(niche, be important to community structure)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(niche, be important to community structure)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(niche, be important to community structure)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(niche, be important to community structure)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(niche, be important to community structure)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(niche, be important to community structure)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(specialization, be important in business)