specialization: be important in business

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents thing
Weight: 0.56
, factor
Weight: 0.48
, program
Weight: 0.48
, option
Weight: 0.47
Siblings facet
Weight: 0.45
, characteristic
Weight: 0.31
, niche
Weight: 0.31
, design pattern
Weight: 0.31
, socialization
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important in business 1.00
be important in operation of market 0.81
be important to economy 0.80
be beneficial to economy 0.78
be important for trade 0.77
be important in economics 0.77
be important in operation 0.77
was important to people 0.76
be important for international trade 0.76
be valuable for international trade 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.61
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(factor, be important in business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(specialization, be important in business)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(specialization, be important in business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(factor, be important in business)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.27
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(specialization, be important in business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(factor, be important in business)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(specialization, be important in business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(niche, be important in business)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(factor, be important in business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(specialization, be important in business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(specialization, be important in business)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(specialization, be important in business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(niche, be important in business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(niche, be important in business)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(specialization, be important in business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(specialization, be important in business)

Similarity expansion

0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(specialization, be important in business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(specialization, was important to people)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(specialization, be important in business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Salient(specialization, be important in operation of market)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(specialization, be important in business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(specialization, be important in operation)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(specialization, be important in business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(specialization, be important to economy)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(specialization, be important in business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(specialization, be important in operation of market)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(specialization, be important in business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Salient(specialization, be important in economics)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(specialization, be important in business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Salient(specialization, be important in operation)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(specialization, be important in business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(specialization, was important to people)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(specialization, be important in business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Salient(specialization, was important to people)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(specialization, be important in business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(specialization, be important in operation of market)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(specialization, be important in business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(specialization, be important in operation of market)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(specialization, be important in business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(specialization, be beneficial to economy)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(specialization, be important in business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(specialization, be important to economy)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(specialization, be important in business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(specialization, be important for trade)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(specialization, be important in business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(specialization, be important to economy)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(specialization, be important in business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(specialization, be important in operation)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(specialization, be important in business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(specialization, be important in economics)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(specialization, be important in business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(specialization, be important for trade)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(specialization, be important in business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(specialization, be beneficial to economy)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(specialization, be important in business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(specialization, be important in economics)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(specialization, be important in business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(specialization, be important to economy)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(specialization, be important in business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(specialization, be important for trade)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(specialization, be important in business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(specialization, be valuable for international trade)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(specialization, be important in business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(specialization, be important for international trade)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(specialization, be important in business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(specialization, be important in economics)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(specialization, be important in business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(specialization, be important for international trade)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(specialization, be important in business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(specialization, be important in operation)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(specialization, be important in business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(specialization, be valuable for international trade)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(specialization, be important in business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(specialization, be important for trade)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(specialization, be important in business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(specialization, be beneficial to economy)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(specialization, be important in business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(specialization, was important to people)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(specialization, be important in business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(specialization, be beneficial to economy)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(specialization, be important in business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(specialization, be important for international trade)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(specialization, be important in business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(specialization, be important for international trade)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(specialization, be important in business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(specialization, be valuable for international trade)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(specialization, be important in business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(specialization, be valuable for international trade)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(specialization, be important in business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(specialization, be important in business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(specialization, be important in business)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(specialization, be important in business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(specialization, be important in business)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.13
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(specialization, be important in business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(factor, be important in business)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(specialization, be important in business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(niche, be important in business)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(specialization, be important in business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(factor, be important in business)